this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
718 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59340 readers
5442 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
718
Colorado enacts right-to-repair law banning restrictions on parts pairing, mirroring Oregon's ban (www.cpr.org)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary:

  • Colorado's new right-to-repair law allows residents to repair their cell phones, computers, and other devices.
  • The law requires manufacturers like Samsung and Apple to provide documentation, software, and tools to device owners and independent repair shops at the same prices as authorized repair providers.
  • The law prohibits manufacturers from restricting replacement parts and displaying misleading alerts about parts.
  • The law passed on partisan lines, with Democrats in support and Republicans opposed, and will take effect on Jan. 1, 2026.
  • Exemptions to the law include video game consoles, medical devices, electric car chargers, and more.
  • Opponents of the law argue it could pose security risks and impact device reliability, while supporters believe it promotes consumer choice and reduces electronic waste.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I understand exception of medical devices where manufacturers carry huge responsibility if something goes wrong. But consoles???

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And car chargers?!? Hell level 2 chargers are glorified extension cords. Why should they get an exception?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

and more

I bet they included farming equipment in the exemption list...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I don’t know. Could still be safety concerns? In many districts/counties you can’t even change a light-switch yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I thought the restriction was CHARGING to replace a light switch as an unlicensed electrician, am I wrong? I've never heard of DIY being disallowed. The only restrictions I know of are needing to pull a permit for structural stuff and I'm in an area with pretty tight electrical regulations (EMT conduit, no Romex allowed)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You could claim safety concerns in anything and everything. Doesn't mean that the manufacturer should have the right to intentionally make things that cannot be repaired due to drm.

In those counties that you cannot change a light switch on your own, do you have to call up the manufacturer of your home(and no other) and pay them to fix your light switch, and then have them say it's better to just buy a whole new house, this one is not worth fixing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, it has to be certified (by state?) electrician.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, exactly. State. Not the company that will profit more from you buying another house because their house is the only one allowed to have the cabinets and organization that you like. And have been using all your life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That’s because the state is essentially responsible for house safety- there are many codes the buildings have to satisfy. Not everything is regulated like that. There are no many codes (if at all) associated with chargers, and charger safety is responsibility of a company making the charger. So at least I can see some logic here. But with low power devices like console the risk is very low to have someone electrocuted because incorrect low voltage (compared to what car is using to charge) card is installed. Maybe there is a risk of fire?