this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
1274 points (87.9% liked)

Comic Strips

12568 readers
3640 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1274
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

i think it's the opposite. in FPTP system the largest minority (of voters) wins. if you vote against one candidate, it will (probably) create/be another minority. to make sure the candidate loses, the largest minority have to agree for another candidate, just voting any other candidate won't do. related cgp grey's video - https://yewtu.be/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo.

edited to clarify. lets assume the election results as:

  • candidate A - 20%
  • candidate B - 35%
  • candidate C - 15%
  • candidate D - 25%
  • candidate E - 05%

candidate B won with only 35% voting for it while 65% voted against candidate B. clealy the majority of people voted against candidate B, but that doesn't matter as in FPTP, not majority but largest minority (35% that voted for candidate B) wins.

thus, i think you vote for not against in FPTP voting system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's an early-stage FPTP system. After a bunch of people with minority support start winning you end up with two options, and you vote against the one you hate least because there's not really a choice anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't against and for mean the same thing with only two choices?!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If I'm given the choice between chocolate and vanilla, choosing vanilla doesn't make it my favorite. It's just the least bad option because caramel isn't available. I'm not for vanilla, I'm against chocolate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

isn't that effectively wordplay? say, i like chocolate but vanilla more. then i choose vanilla but i'm not against chocolate. it doesn't matter when two given choices.

but that's doesn't account for non-late-stage FPTP. given more than two choices i'd have to vote for a candidate. voting against other candidate may not work because largest minority wins.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

you can't prove this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

With no offense intended, I feel this could be worded a little better. It could also just be my tired brain, though.