this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
190 points (88.9% liked)

Fediverse

17779 readers
67 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ugh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope people on the Fediverse will finally learn not to choose the biggest instance all the time

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's more like the previous commentor said. It's the communities more than the users. Every post, comment, like needs to be sent to every other instance that subscribes to the community. I suspect it's definitely connected to federation. The reason being, at 20:00 utc yesterday lemmy.world stopped sending my instance anything (previously it was between 2 and 5 messages a second). It only started again at around 00:00 utc. I wonder if they were slowly adding instances back to federation?

In any case the load for that many communities with that many other instances must be huge. The advantages of the fediverse requires that communities AND users are spread between instances. In the current climate, the super instances have most of both and it must be becoming exponentially harder to keep up with hardware requirements for this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a very valid point. Sometimes I question if very small instances (1-10 users) are not more detrimental than anything to the general performance

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whose fault is it though? If an instance is capable of 100 concurrent users but everyone flocks to the two or three big instances. What to do? Block instances so they shutdown? Then when the shit really hits the fan there's nowhere to distribute users to.

In the case of lemmy.world I might suggest they split the instance. Original lemmy.world keeps the communities but has no users. Create a new instance and transfer the users. That way the first instance is dedicated to federating the communities, moving the real time user database hits to a separate database. I'd also suggest preventing the creation of new communities on that instance.

In real terms it'd have been better if the communities were shared between instances more. Making a more even spread of the one to many distribution efforts.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

sounds like a cool idea. hit Ruud up once they're less busy.