this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
73 points (94.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7233 readers
285 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pragmatically, they're endorsing the lesser of two evils to encourage people to vote for the lesser of two evils. They think Biden being in office will be much better for LGBT people than Trump will be, to the point that it's worth it to spend millions to encourage votes for Biden. Third parties are very unlikely to win, so it's not worth it; they could spend millions on some other project to more directly help LGBT people.
If you think it's OK to vote for the lesser of two evils, then I don't see why you draw the line at endorsing the lesser of two evils.
The ethical thing to do is not to endorse someone who is funding a genocide, no matter how much he helps your marginalized group