this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
660 points (92.5% liked)

Degrowth

747 readers
23 users here now

Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"with the same safety features"

Eh, no, cars from 40 years ago wouldn't pass current safety tests

Cars of the same size weight a lot more now than they used to back in the day and safety features is one of the main reasons.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Here is the same thing I posted, but reworded slightly to be more clear.

We make some cars now with modern safety feature that are big and some that are just as small as the econoboxes from 40 years ago. A Honda Fit for example is just as small, but with modern safety features.

I said nothing about weight.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

In 1984 the smallest Volkswagen was the Polo, weighing 685 kg. Now it is the Up, weighing 991 kg. That's 45% more weight. Now you specifically didn't mention weight, but all that weight has to go somewhere, especially considering most materials mostly got lighter.