this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
114 points (94.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43833 readers
1060 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lemmy has no algorithm.
That's not really what I was referring to. Sure it selects posts automatically but it's not like it picks what it thinks a specific user is going to click on.
but it is just a simple vote count/time decay, no consideration given to what you have interacted with in the past, ie the "algorithm" on other platforms
That's why the content isn't sorted as well as it could be. There's no one-size-fits-all for social media as people have different things they like.
Yes there is, and it's not that different from reddit. The sorting algorithm is what they refer to. Eg, hot is some balance of time vs votes, which greatly favours newer posts (too new, IMO -- posts it shows will typically no comments or maybe just one or two). Active favours high commenting rates and based on my observations, it seems to drop off around 2 days (too old, IMO -- a considerable number of posts shown by this algorithm seem to be around the 2 day mark). The top and new algorithms are straightforward enough.
All the algorithms favour big communities. There's a "best" algorithm in development, which would try to look at the top for each community and thus give smaller communities a chance. I can't wait for that, because right now, you'll rarely if ever see a small community hit the front page and it sucks bad.