this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)
Libraries
491 readers
42 users here now
For talk of all things related to libraries!
Please follow this instances rules.
To find more communities on this instance, go to: [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
After reading the article it’s not as great as I was hoping for. From the article:
So it’s still a profit-driven press. This is a conflict of interest but the library seems confident they can negoiate that fairly.
I was hoping the press would become non-profit and then be used to print and distribute creative commons licensed content. I have a friend (who shall remain unnamed but who is well known) who would like to release their work into the commons and give up all rights apart from attribution. In principle a library-owned press would seem ideal. But I guess this is not the right tool for the job. It also seems the books this press will print are LA-specific anyway.