23
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love this. Saw it on the news last night. The proposal is likely to cost twice as much as they say because they took the cost from the original proposal and didn't update them.

However, the brilliant part of promising to spend money on roads, funding it from the National Land Transport Fund, is that you don't have to raise taxes. If you take the money from the NLTF, you take money away from other roading projects instead.

So the proposal is basically to not build or repair other roads, and instead spend the money on these projects. It looks like a great election promise (to certain voter bases) but it's all smoke and mirrors.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

You’re forgetting that modern conservative political parties have no platform that actually addresses the needs of our time. As a larger percentage of voters become downtrodden, value signalling and virtue signalling is no longer enough to secure victory for the business owners and 1%ers. They need to add “boots on the ground” initiatives to get the votes. The old favourites are highways and tough-on-crime. They’re essentially returning to the empty pantry over and over looking for something to eat. A four laner from Wh. To Tau. would take 8 years just to sort out land rights. This is just National throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. The NLTF as it is can barely support road required maintenance and renewal. I suspect the National supporters who like this plan are the same people that complain about potholes.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Exactly this. We cannot maintain the routes we have, never mind building more. They didn't even cost it properly.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Add to that some of the interviews saying there isn't that much traffic on these roads anyway, and that induced demand is a real thing, you have a transport policy which will add nothing to the economy of NZ except for the contractors.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well even the contracters won't be new, they will just be taken off the other projects that lose funding from this.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
23 points (92.6% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1630 readers
39 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS