this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
69 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
510 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I miss the days of VHS and DVD shelfs in homes, for example. If you bought the tapes and had them in your home, no corporate entity could alter those tapes without your consent, monitor how many times you watch them, sell your data to whomever they please without your knowledge, roll out new mandatory conditions to a 'user agreement,' or remove them from your library if/when they like.

I noticed some dumb change in how Dictionary definitions are shown in the Spotlight (ie, overall search my computer function) in MacOS this week. I've turned off all auto-updates, and I didn't make that change or consent to it. But despite paying the full price all by myself for this machine, I clearly don't have 100% control over it. It seems very clearly to me that consumers having control and privacy over their Internet-connected devices is a bygone era.

After Blizzard, the video game company, replaced copies of Warcraft 3 that I and others had paid for in full and installed on our computers that we could play without connecting to the Internet with a lower-quality copy that prohibited offline play - I swore I'd never pay for a video game again*, and 3 years later I haven't backslid on that. I felt so angry, cheated, and robbed by that. (*Edit: my criticism and frustration is really more with larger developers/companies/creators - I appreciate and am happy to support smaller, more independent and libre ones.)

Many people probably won't be bothered by these things, but I am. I don't want to pay full price for something that I don't truly own. I miss the familiarity. I miss the reliability. I miss feeling like it's mine. Dependable. Trustworthy.

Picking my old guitar up again has never looked so appealing. I think I want to go back to investing more time, money, and energy into things that aren't connected to the internet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For that to be the case, you would have to already be planning to purchase the good, and then decide to pirate it instead.

The mental gymnastics you people go through to justify theft is honestly just astonishing, that you're able to delude yourself in this way. It's fascinating from a psychological perspective.

it still requires absurd mental gymnastics to reframe not paying someone money as stealing money from that person.

I agree. No one said that though. You're not stealing money, you're stealing intellectual property. Something someone, or more likely multiple or hundreds of someones dedicated time and money to create, with the expectation of compensation from it's consumer.

it places the onus for fairly compensating artists on the audience instead of the industry.

It places it on the consumer. You know, the person who benefits from the project's creation?

Which is why I mentioned direct donation:

LOL oh please, go on, where are you submitting your "donations" to? Does Brad Pitt have a Patreon page now?

It must be so nice to live in a fictional utopia where everyone is fairly compensated and no one tries to take from others, which is, ironically, exactly what you're doing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Oh, you believe in intellectual property. I don't, and I find the concept an affront to human creativity.

Brad Pitt doesn't need donations. Anyone who does generally has avenues -- very often Patreons, yes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't, and I find the concept an affront to human creativity

I'm shocked that you don't respect human creativity...

Brad Pitt doesn't need donations.

And I'm shocked that you're now moving the goalposts.

J/K I've heard this same bullshit justifications 38472893 times and am completely unsurprised. Goodbye.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that's totally what "an affront to" means. And if you're seriously arguing that someone with a 9-figure net worth needs compensation to keep producing art, I don't know what to say to you. I'm not moving any goalposts, I've said multiple times that you should support independent creators if you can afford to. Brad Pitt is not an "independent creator", he's a fixture in the movie industry who gets paid millions of dollars upfront. Your priorities are gross.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

they're just projecting their own tactics on you.

they're the one moving the goalposts with that laughable brad pitt bs.