this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
84 points (71.9% liked)

memes

10405 readers
1793 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"b-but bears are actually dangerous!" Shut the hell up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Very few people someone gets near enough to be grabbed by want to rape them. Nearly every bear someone gets near enough to be grabbed by wants to kill them. A large number of women feel it is better to be killed by a bear than live with their irrational fear that every man they get near shall rape them. The fear not being rational is irrelevant as the fear is based upon a more than likely chance, approx. 25% is reported, that at some point the fear was justified and not irrational. However those numbers are screwy as folks that get raped are more likely to get raped again.

I'd give percentage chances of each occurring, (the National Park Service estimates the odds of being attacked by a bear are about one in 2.1 million​.), but the media seems to only report percentage of gender raped not chance of rape.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Please show where I stated anything of the desires of the bear. I'm hinging nothing on proximity. You are simply assuming things I did not state. I covered that it wasn't a risk assessment. Only thing bogged down is so bogged with your assumptions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I responded to what you wrote. Yes there was some inference based on your words. I’m not getting bogged down in prescriptive nonsense.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, you did not. You wrote in response to what you pretended I posted. You again are only bogged by your choice to pretend I posted something very different than I posted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bruh, it's not even about rape. A dude negatively impacting a woman's physical or emotional well being compromises their safety.

The odds you mentioned of bear attacks seem a lot lower than the odds of a woman having to deal with shit from men. I say this as a man who worked in the boreal for 10 years and with a pile of construction folks (men and women).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

None of which is relevant to my statement.