this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
-7 points (38.7% liked)

Conservative

369 readers
36 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Now do the (wholly fabricated, and known so by all using it) Steel Dossier and boy Biden being paid $50k/mo by Ukraine operatives...

And since the announcement of not buying Russian uranium, look into Hillary'S dealings with Ukraine and uranium.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Now do the (wholly fabricated, and known so by all using it) Steel Dossier and boy Biden being paid $50k/mo by Ukraine operatives...

Sure.

  1. There is no Steel Dossier. I will assume you typoed Steele.
  2. Mr Steele reportedly said he had been interviewed by Mr Mueller's team for two days but was "surprised that very little of what I had discussed with them appeared in the final report." In fact, I can find no evidence that the "all" you refer to as using the Steele Dossier exist - no one appears to be "using it" for anything.
  3. "boy Biden" is an ambiguous term. I will assume "boy" means "Hunter".
  4. The only connection I can find between Hunter and the number "50,000" or thereabouts is that that is the rounded value of how much Hunter Biden was paying $49,910 every three months for office space in D.C.
  5. "Ukraine operatives" is also ambiguous, and I'm not sure what to do with it. It is absolutely easily-confirmed public knowledge that Hunter made money from Burisma - about 11 million in 6 years, or ballpark 153k per month. Is there something there you want to delve into?