57
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

While multiple factors play a role in falling divorce rates, the costs of separation make going it alone a daunting prospect for many Canadians.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

It's not just the affordability factor, either.

I've been with my partner for 8 years now. We've owned a home together for 5. She and her ex have yet to get divorced. There's been no meaningful impetus to drive them to do it: It doesn't change their relationship any further, it doesn't change her relationship with me at all, yet it costs a couple thousand bucks.

Why spend that on lawyers when you could spend it on car repairs, home upgrades, a plethora of takeout meals, or a vacation?

[-] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago

Yikes man, owning a home with someone married to someone else is super dangerous for you.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

Not to mention medical situations. Suddenly you have no rights over your long term partners health/life if they are incapacitated.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Yeah but think of all the takeout meals it would cost for the divorce

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Let's hope his partner doesn't get hit by a bus.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Both ways. He should live it up for a couple of years. Make sure to use her line of credit and credit cards. His wife’s ex-husband will have to pay half when they finally divorce. Buy a car in her name, sell it, and use the proceeds to buy a car in your name. The possibilities are endless.

[I am not advocating this obviously. Mostly I am agreeing how super dangerous this is.]

[-] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

Hey guess who gets your wife's pension and insurance payouts? Her legal husband.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago

Hey guess who gets your wife’s pension

Hahahahaha. What decade are you living in?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

By all means, test out what her ex will be entitled to.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The designated beneficiary does.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

Marriage has all kinds of default legal implications ranging from property ownership to inheritance and tax benefits, and may also affect insurance rates.

How you are affected depends on where you live and your personal situation.

Frankly, a blanket statement like this is completely irresponsible. Consult a lawyer on these matters, people. Or spend tens of thousands of dollars later in life dealing with the consequences of ignoring your legal rights and responsibilities.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

Frankly, a blanket statement like this is completely irresponsible.

Only if you're taking as advice for some reason, not someone's lived reality.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Cool! her ex owns 25% of your house. That's very generous of you.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What is wrong with you? This is the worst thing I’ve read on lemmy all day

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
57 points (91.3% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
359 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS