this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16759 readers
1006 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If this is about the new PSN requirements, I don't even think Arrowhead should take the blame. That was obviously something that came down from the publisher.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Arrowhead, as the developers and artists who worked to create the game, deserve little to none of the blame. Arrowhead, as the business entity who voluntarily entered into an agreement with Sony to have this requirement in their game in the first place, definitely deserves the blame. Whatever project lead thought this was an acceptable concession to make in order to secure funding from Sony was definitely not on the same page as the rest of the team who actually made the game.

Seeing a lot of parallels to the Cyberpunk 2077 launch; beautiful game created by a passionate team who loved their craft, massively damaged by short-sighted, greedy decisions by studio execs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is a lot of words to say "I'm angry and I want to blame a hardworking creative studio, instead of the massive, famously consumer unfriendly, publisher that's actually at fault".

Does the game on Steam deserve the downvotes? Yes. 100%. The game on Steam is a direct result of the developers work and Sony's publishing. But it's not the developer's work that is causing problems, but Sony's publishing decisions that have negatively impacted the experience for huge numbers of people.

So does the developer Arrowhead deserve blame for accepting a contract to produce a game for Sony's IP? No, they did that and did their jobs as contracted. Sony is the only party here that deserves blame for enforcing an asinine account policy that they're competitors (i.e. Microsoft), do not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I believe Sony owns the Helldivers IP, so they may not have had much choice in the matter.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Oh, that is a great point. It’s possible their hands were 100% tied on this simply due to who controls the IP.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They may not be to blame, but they are responsible.

For instance if they knew this was coming down the pipeline as a requirement, this should have been in place on day one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So they should’ve delayed the release until Sony got their shit together with the PSN API?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

If they wanted to make PlayStation networks 100% hard requirement for the game, that should have been there on day one. The enforcement should have been there. Even if the API servers were having issues the enforcement should have been there.

The software's behavior is the social contract with the user. If steam says a PlayStation network account is required, and you load the game and it's only needed for cross play or it's optional. That is the defacto contract. And that has existed for about 4 months.

It's entirely possible to buy the game, without seeing the PlayStation button. If you just click buy now, or get it from your wish list or whatever, you're not presented with anything indicating PlayStation is required. So the common use case for a steam user, is to run the game, oh it needs this network That's not cool refund. This program has broken that pattern.

So yes it is entirely the developers fault, if this is a hard requirement it should always be hard requirement, not after 4 months. That is changing the lived gamer experience.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It was. PSN linking was available day one, and they disabled it temporarily when the traffic was too much for the auth server to handle. Not reading doesn't mean the requirement wasn't communicated to you.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

100% it wasn't communicated to users as the experience did not require it. For 3 months.

This is a policy CHANGE. Hence the need for an announcement

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Quite literally was talked about in patch notes and mentioned on the storefront pages where it was available.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If it wasn't a change, why the need for an announcement?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

The service was decoupled when auth servers couldn't handle traffic the first few days. A good number of people, myself and my static included, DID already link PSN accounts. Mine is registered from the bahamas. I do not live in the bahamas.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

They might not be the at fault party, the guilty party but they are the responsible party. It's their game, their interface with people, their reputation.