this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
16 points (86.4% liked)

Political Memes

5683 readers
2087 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Same. They can't allow acknowledgement of Europe being in the most peaceful span of its recorded history thanks to the EU and NATO. That cooperation and allowing people to be different but still respectful has been a success for many.

They're stuck in the burn it all down phase of being an edgy teenager that finds out life is hard. Unfair. And kinda sucks sometimes. That humans aren't perfect and therefore our societies and systems also aren't perfect.

But they'd throw it all away instead of iterating on what already works. My job is literally process improvement and change management. People who try to come up with the best idea on their own fail. It's diversity of thought and background that leads to the best solutions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

You got it all wrong.

They like socialism. So they need to defend ultra capitalist dictatorships where class division is in the actual binary state they hate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

In the late 90s and early 2000s, who exactly was NATO defending itself against? there was no longer an adversary superpower that needed to be fought with mass fighter jets and tanks. Russia was agreeing to let American military aircraft through its airspace for chrissakes

The only reason NATO stuck around back then was that a bunch of bureaucrats really wanted to keep their jobs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's amazing you're trying this rhetoric when Russia is literally on the warpath.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I recently read a book about the relevant history and it's been 20-30 years since. I was curious about how Russia started on the warpath and the transition from Clinton to Bush (Iraq, the ABM treaty, etc) was a fairly major factor. It was a very jarring contrast reading speeches and news reports from back then, such as the franco-german-russian united front against the iraq war. Things could have gone very differently back then if a few decisions weren't made.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago
  1. I can't believe you fell for that. And 2) back to the original point of late ninties early 2000s, some people can see beyond the very measly 5 years you tried to limit it to. Ciao.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Funny how right after Openskies ended Russia invades a country. Almost seems like all the precautions in place were kinda keeping them from misbehaving.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the same energy as polo is gone so we don't need vaccines anymore.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Comparing an entire country to a disease, stay classy reddit

idk how else to respond lol. Did not expect to see defenses of the bush administration's foreign policy on lemmy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Truth is you had no point. And it was easily shown with 1 sentence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No, the point is that the situation was a bit more complicated than "Russia is a disease that cannot be reasoned with" within living memory. Sure at this point we're cheerfully careening towards ww3 with all diplomacy out the window (with Russia as a primary driver). But it didn't use to be like that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Reality is more complicated than the strawman you were putting into someone else's mouth? Ya don't say.... I mean that's sort of the point of a strawman like the one you were making.

But also, I've not seen any serious analysis backing the idea we're currently on a path to WW3. Such a situation is unlikely to be produced by the Ukrainian conflict alone.

To back that claim you're going to have to rely on theoretical escalations outside that conflict... And that's not what "careening towards" means.

If a car is careening towards something, it doesn't mean - it would be happening if it means it is happening BECAUSE...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was founded in 1949 and is a group of 32 countries from Europe and North America that exists to protect the people and territory of its members.

... treaties don't just disappear after a short amount of peace. I think it would take at least 50 solid years and probably some democracy for that sort of thing to happen.