this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
389 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

11217 readers
2640 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
389
It's a trap! (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 99 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thirsty for uranium?

H~2~O~4~U!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (5 children)

What would this taste like?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

Looks like someone tried:

Uranyl salts are toxic and can cause severe chronic kidney disease and acute tubular necrosis. Target organs include the kidneys, liver, lungs and brain. Uranyl ion accumulation in tissues including gonocytes produces congenital disorders, and in white blood cells causes immune system damage. Uranyl compounds are also neurotoxins. Uranyl ion contamination has been found on and around depleted uranium targets.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Decay

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Does Uranium decay when it’s in compounds with other elements? What happens to the bonds when it turns into some other element? What happens to the compound?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Chemical bonds can affect decay rates IIRC, but it's not usually a huge difference. The nucleus is still going to be unstable. It definitely changes the molecule (and might break it)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Chemical bonds can affect decay rates IIRC

That's interesting. Only read about this in High School and maybe because of the "not usually a huge difference", it was claimed that chemical bonds don't affect decay rates.
I always felt a bit weird with that conclusion, but maybe it was just to make the maths easier, not having to include effects from another force into the calculations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

It's like saying ants don't affect buildings. In the vast majority of situations it's true, but carpenter ants can destroy wooden structures in some cimates.

The high school class is concerned about the effects of gravity, wind, rain, earthquakes, and maybe taxes on buildings, while the college+ classes can get into the effects of wood eating organisms, angry tenants, and killdozers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was reading about some terribly unholy chemistry once where the researchers wanted to make a molecule but it just wouldn't happen. So they instead made it with a radioactive isotope of a heavier element, then as it decays the molecule becomes their desired product.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay_technique

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

That is SICK. I love science hacks. Thank you for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Green Skittles

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

and then blood.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

That's the aftertaste. Comes after quite a while.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Peroxide and dead mouth flesh.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

i dont know, but since it is produced in a stage of uranium enrichmet, and chemists have a worrying tendency to accidentally taste stuff, I am convinced there's someone out there who knows.