this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
798 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

10988 readers
2026 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
798
Checks out to me. (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 156 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Fun fact: There's a pretty compelling case to be made that early photosynthesizing organisms were purple instead of green, so that for about half a billion years the earth was purple and blue like a cyberpunk street scene.

[–] [email protected] 114 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Oh Wikipedia, please never change.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia can be weird sometimes. I'm trying to get an article approved and every time I re-submit it gets denied for different reasons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've never had to get a new article approved. I just write it. Is it about something very controversial?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Uh, what? As far I can tell every new draft needs to be approved before switching to the main page.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is not standard practice. An article that is controversial or one that has been vandalised a lot may put in place such a policy. But the vast majority of articles on (English) Wikipedia can be freely edited.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about updating an existing article. I'm taking about publishing an entirely new page. I can and do make corrections and additions to existing articles without review. I wrote a completely new article and every time I submit it for review it comes back with a different reason for rejection. However, the most recent one was actually due to a misunderstanding on my part about acceptable sources (turns out I was being more restrictive than I needed to be), so at least it'll be easy to implement the changes this reviewer wants to see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have never had to submit a new article for review. Are you writing articles on a topic that is controversial?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nope! Just some technical stuff. Maybe it's one of of those things where there's not technically an enforcement mechanism. I read all about how to start a draft and turn it into a full article, which includes submitting it for review. Maybe you can just decide not to do that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I'm guessing that's a new guideline then. It wasn't there when I joined. Also I might have been granted autopatrolled at some point, which might be why I get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

This is awesome! I've never heard of this before!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Somewhere out in the infinitely expanding Universe is a Psychlo very disappointed by what he just read.