Today I learned

7864 readers

2 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

139

TIL that Gwyneth Paltrow is not just a harmless grifter (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I never went as far as to defend Gwyneth Paltrow, but after her Hot Ones appearance I created a post (which I will link in the comments) where I suggested that she's done no more harm than male grifters and that the dislike of her as a person was primarily due to misogyny. That's before I learned about her promotion of these unproven "vampire facials". Now an unlicensed clinic performing this procedure has given at least three women HIV. You guys were right and I was wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I mean, yeah, she's to blame for promoting an obviously batshit crazy process, but she was NOT involved with any of the facilities distributing HIV. That's a bit of a stretch.

It would be like, I dunno, blaming your favorite tattooed celebrity because you got hepatitis c from some back alley artist.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I see what you're saying, but the treatment is unproven even under sanitary conditions and she probably helped make people aware of it using her largish social media platform. I say she deserves at least some of the blame.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tbf, it's more like the tattooed celebrity was promoting back alley artists. It's a weird middle ground

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago

I understand that she said it was a good and helpful procedure.

I don't think it's at all fair to say she told people to go to unlicensed places