this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
129 points (97.1% liked)

Anticonsumption

346 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it was the prime minister (or spokesperson) who made this very clever argument: (paraphrasing) “we are not taking away choice… cigarettes are designed to inherently take away your choice by trapping you in an addiction.”

I’m not picking sides here, just pointing out a great piece of rhetoric to spin the policy as taking away something that takes away your choice. Effectively putting forward the idea that you don’t have choice to begin with.

(sorry to say this rhetoric was not mentioned in the linked article; I just heard it on BBC World Service)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think my biggest point is- if it's the carcinogens you're wanting to ban then do so. This is akin to banning coca-cola outright and not just the cocaine in it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I think it would be nigh-impossible to make tobbaco non-carcinogenic though. And even without cancers, there's also a myriad of respiratory issues, cardiovascular problems and even autoimmune problems stemming from cigarette use to account for. I don't think it would be feasible to ban the harmful ingredients and have anything left over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

^this guy over here trying to sell organic cigarettes

XD