MeanwhileOnGrad
"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"
Welcome to MoG!
Meanwhile On Grad
Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!
What is a Tankie?
Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.
(caution of biased source)
Basic Rules:
Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.
Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.
Apologia — (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.
Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.
Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.
Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.
You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.
view the rest of the comments
He was banned for that? So there is really no space for different opinions on lemmy.world?
There's opinions and then there's blatant lies. This is an example of the latter. Should blatant lies be bannable?
I checked the cited article, I don’t know about how trustworthy the news site is, but apparently it had existed in Israel for a while, if Wikipedia is to be believed, and it seems to make a decent case for questioning the acceptance of such a salute
Even blatant lie should not be banned. Because maybe its what he thinks its true, so who are you to say its a blatant lie.
The worst thing is that the person is not completely wrong.
I am not saying that everyone is Nazi there, I am just saying that the problem with Nazism still exists.
I don't disagree with you on principle but even if that person thinks something is true when it isn't that doesn't mean they aren't spreading lies. And they should be called out for it for what it is, not sparring that persons feelings.
Finland still officially use the swastika but that doesn't make them nazi...
Sure, engage in discussion and prove them wrong. Let the readers determine who is right and who is wrong.
Banning is censoring, and it creates an echochamber here.