chapotraphouse

13198 readers

375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

147

title (hexbear.net)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (8 children)

there is a correlation with men who ejaculate less than 21 times per month and an increased risk of prostate cancer

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

~~I believe it's a marginal increase in risk.~~

31% decreased risk and 1 in 8 American men get diagnosed. It's actually more optimal to do 4-7 times/wk compared to less. I wanted to be a contrarian and say you don't have to, and you don't, but it might be worth looking into (the link in bio).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

4-7 ejaculations per week is optimal in decreasing prostate cancer risk?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I don't know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What if your metric is being terminally cum brained?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

then start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

ಠ_ಠ more optimal

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

nofap is over. now we're opti-fapping. i have a browser extension that opens and closes a porn tab automatically so i can time my JO sesh to the second. this will allow me to live forever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

COMRADE PLEASE BE CAREFUL WITH THE LATHE! IT COULD HAVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

load more comments (5 replies)