this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
-44 points (26.1% liked)
Linux
48212 readers
678 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He says it's based, not that is Unix.
It's not Unix-based either.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO%E2%80%93Linux_disputes
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux
But on the same links you sent are saying:
What difference are between "*-based" and "*-like"? If the meaning are the same then I'm right, if Unix-based means must be like a fork directly from Unix and not just a copy build from 0, then yeah, you are right. And I think based and like are the same meaning.
Edit:
I also found this image: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Unix_timeline.en.svg
Unix timeline:
Edit 2:
I just asked to ChatGPT and seems the AI can explain this:
So you are right, and they probably wanted to mean Unix-like. But we could still say based as both has some kind of relationship, and that's why Linux it's on Unix timeline from wiki.
So far my claims are:
Linux is not Unix
Linux is not "based" on Unix
I've proven both claims using respected sources.
From your reading, the missing clarification you are looking for is "POSIX". Most people don't know what POSIX is, that's why it reads "Unix-Like" for general audiences. If Unix didn't exist another synonym would supplement.
Back to my original point -- the OP, a layman, probably in good faith and though a honest misunderstanding, repeated a false claim that was resolved in a International 10+ year lawsuit in 2007.
It's literally mal-information. But hey in sure your elders think that a Xbox, PS5 and Computer are all "Nintendo's or whatever".
Well doesn't they just mean there is no Unix code in Linux. It can behave the same without using any of their code.