this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
194 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13198 readers
375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

According to the ModifyNOTA website, fewer than 1% of registered organ donors die in such a way that enables their kidneys to be harvested. Also, a living-donor kidney lasts twice as long on average as a deceased-donor kidney.

Yes it would definitely help to make organ donation opt-out, and we should totally do that, but they're saying this still wouldn't be enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

your first sentence has nothing to do with what i said because those people already registered. the stat you want is people who are not donors dying in a way that we could've used their organs but didn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

that would presumably also be <1%, wouldn't it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

i wouldn't make that kind of assumption about the behavior of the two groups

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I would make this assumption in this case.

You think people who would opt-in register for organ donation would be less likely to die in a way compatible with kidney harvesting than others?

I think it's somewhat unlikely that whether or not someone registers to be an organ donor would affect how they are likely to die, but if it did, I would wager that registered organ donors are more likely to die in a way that enables their kidneys to be harvested than others. In any case, I doubt the difference is more than, say, a factor of 2.