29
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Comparative Geography is fun

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

this isn't comparative geography if it isn't actively adjusting the mercator projection. the distortion of canada here appears to not be corrected. this is not an accurate statement due to the extreme stretching of the mercator projection near the poles.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Canada shrank by like three times when I pulled it down and I did the math to double-check: the distance between the northern mainland shore and the tippy top of that island extending beyond the map is 1,800 kms, from the northern shore to the US border is 2,000 kms, so pulling the southern border of Canada to the southern US border would still extend the northern Canadian islands into mainland northern Canada

Had more than 3,700 kms to play with in total, from North Dakota to the Rio Grande is only 2,000 km, damn that country is big

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

can't argue with that then.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

case in point, if this is done correctly, one can see for example that greenland and mexico are very similar sizes.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13198 readers
375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS