141
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
141 points (98.6% liked)
Firefox
4119 readers
2 users here now
A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
But why? There's no need for a PDF editor in a browser. This is just raising the size and lowering the performance of a browser for a feature that almost no one needs or wants.
Mozilla should probably build a PDF viewer/editor (Adobe sucks and Foxit has gone downhill in recent years), but it's not part of Firefox.
I actually like this a lot. Why not make computer things easy for people using them? In environments where people send forms as non-editable .pdf files, this is great!
Not needing to pay money just to add some text to a PDF is a very nice feature. Especially since PDFs already open in Firefox by default.
I appreciate this. Previously I had to switch to Edge for a moment just for PDF editing.
Editable PDF's are commonly used around the world, for statistics, beurocracy and application processes. Having a program readily available to edit those is generally a good thing.
It also prevents Adobe from getting downloads, which is an absolute win.
I read this and immediately celebrated it as the greatest feature to grace firefox in a while. It's already my default pdf viewer since it means I don't have to start up any program to view a pdf, now I also don't need to do that to edit one.
As someone who reads PDFs almost exclusively, you have no idea how handy this tool is for those of us who do use it. Firefox really is leading in this regard for its users and us happy few are so happy right now.