this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
216 points (99.1% liked)

World News

38956 readers
1524 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A cargo ship crashed into one of two main supports for the 2.5km long bridge at around 1:30AM EDT.

There is an ongoing search and rescue effort and authorities are looking for upwards of seven people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

Two pilots were on board. Apparently there were issues with the ship's propulsion system at last inspection. My money is on a mechanical issue; if not, this was a monumental fuck up by the harbor pilots and/or the crew.

edit: lol, I am pleased with how this comment has aged. Yes, it was a power loss. Quick thinking and action saved lives. Bravo. Now it remains to be seen whether deferred maintenance or similar negligence were to blame; if so, people need to pay up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why no tug boats to assist the vessel? I find it odd that the ship was allowed to depart on its own.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I assume it was already under way (or whatever).

I watch commercial shipping all day out my office window, almost all tugs are used to just move the ship away from the wharf, something on the order of a boat-length.

I don't know what the layout of the harbour in this incident, but the boat could have been kilometres from the wharf where it docked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for replying. I’m looking at it from the perspective of proximity to critical infrastructure, but your reply makes plenty of sense. It does make incidents like this more a case of when and not if.

I’m not from the region (let alone the same country) but I would think this is going to have a significant impact on the port operations, assuming it can continue to operate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Apparently it almost happened again in Sydney today.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I watch ships in Astoria. I never see tugboats. The ship operate under theiR own power

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I'm reasonably sure it's up to the harbour master of the port in question, or whatever governing body in whichever jurisdiction applies.

I imagine every port in the world has its own distinct set of regulations.

load more comments (6 replies)