this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
36 points (92.9% liked)
China, 中国
852 readers
3 users here now
English
This is a forum dedicated to China, Chinese culture Chinese language, and Chinese people.
Rules:
- Be civil, be respectful, don't attack other users
- No racism, sinophobia, or other bigotry allowed
- No misinformation
- Follow all other Lemmy rules
中文
这是一个专门讨论中国、中国文化、中国语言和中国人的论坛。
规则:
- 要文明，要尊重，不要攻击其他用户
- 不允许有种族主义、仇视中国人或其他偏执行为
- 不允许故意提供错误信息
- 遵守 Lemmy 的所有其他规则
Related communities / 相关的互联网论坛
Community icon by CustomDesign on MYICONFINDER, licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm actually surprised it took this long. I'm continuously puzzled by how governments around the world don't appear to take seriously the potential risks associated with depending on all this computer technology from USA - especially given the track record of the US government when it comes to the abuse of information technology.
The article only says the replacement tech should be 'domestic'. Presumably domestic Linux distros could satisfy that requirement for the OS, but I only really know about Intel and AMD in the CPU space. Does China already have viable domestic alternatives or are they going to focus resources into developing something new?
they are upstreaming LoongArch cpu architecture since a few months ago
I very much agree that having domestically developed hardware and software is far safer. For most governments this is simply not an option since only a handful of countries are capable of developing their technology stacks. I imagine in case of China, this must be a huge undertaking given the size of the country. It's definitely better to do it sooner than later though.
China does have a number of domestic designs based on RISC-V architecture, and they also have their own Linux distro that's already being phased in since 2022