169

But is it bad? Who's to say? (hexbear.net)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link of the article's content beyond the paywall.

Canonical link if you want to receive psychic damage from that very real paywall message.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 52 points 5 months ago

Is it bad?

$75 per month?

Yeah, it's pretty fuckin' bad.

This feels like the economic equivalent of climate change deniers promoting forest fires as, exclusively and inherently, a good thing because they 'make all that new growth' after this-is-fine

[-] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

I truly cannot wait to see how evolution adapts all the trees to being constantly on fire.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

Financial Times actually as good articles which is why I read them on archive. No way I'm paying for the newspaper of the ruling class, not even if I could afford it

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024

169 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13198 readers

375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]