1225
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The existing legal precedence in most places is that most use of ML doesn't count as human expression and doesn't have copyright protection. You have to have significant control over the creation of the output to have copyright (the easiest workaround is simply manually modifying the ML output and then only releasing the modified version)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The existing legal precedence

I know that's how law works, but there is no precedent for AI at this scale and will only get worse. What if AI gains full sentience? Are they a legally recognised person? Do they have rights and do they not own the copyright themselves? All very good questions with no precedent in law.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The law says human creative expression

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

At what point does human creative expression become a sentient being?

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
1225 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45179 readers
2459 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS