this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
458 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House Republicans James Comer and Jim Jordan, who are leading an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, refused to second a motion made by Representative Jared Moskowitz, a Florida Democrat, to impeach the president.

Moskowitz tried to put the motion on the table for a vote on Wednesday in an effort to call GOP lawmakers' bluff in what he called a "fake" probe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I have no doubts they are going to drag this out until much closer to the election so they can impeach him at some critical moment to get media headlines to sway people into thinking Biden is just as bad as trump.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 51 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why wait? Haven't they been impeaching this guy for like a year at this point?

I tend to believe that if they could they would have done it already just to be petty.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This was what was so crazy about Trump vs Obama. Obama had such a a big target on his back, he had to act unimpeachably. But Trump was pretty much impeachable from the start.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They went after Obama for silly things like mustard and suits and putting his feet on his own desk [yes, these were actually things they got mad about] When they saw that it wasn't getting traction they stepped back. They knew if they impeached Obama they'd never get another Black vote ever.

They were after Bill Clinton from Day One. They pushed the Whitewater probe before he entered office, and tried to make 'Travelgate' [Clinton's team fired some White House staff without realizing they had tenure. ] Vince Foster was a Clinton family friend who committed suicide after the election. The GOP said he was murdered.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Both of them were key goals of Fox News. Which started under Clinton.

How is it possible one little cable network has so much power??

Well. Best not to think about it.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Because it was never just "one little cable network". It was a Murdoch outlet with a ton of economic and political support from the major power players of the US right wing high society from day one.

It was never not designed to monumentally sway public debate and political policymaking.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

https://theweek.com/articles/880107/why-fox-news-created

People on the Right learned one big lesson from Watergate. Control the media at all costs!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

But Trump was ~~pretty much~~ impeachable from the start.

FTFY; no weasel words necessary. Trump was violating the Emoluments Clause from the second he was sworn in.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 8 months ago

I absolutely believe if they could have made the smallest thing stick they would. They probably would do it a second time before the election if the first one fell through. "LOOK AT BIDEN! HE HAS TWO IMPEACHMENTS AS WELL AND JUST AS MANY SENATE CONVICTIONS AS TRUMP"

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If they didn't have the votes before, they definitely won't have them before the election.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The point isn't to actually impeach him, it's to make a big media circus that frightens and confuses voters. They want the biggest news story in the days leading up to the election to be "Biden lookin sus" as opposed to Trump's criminal history or the state of the economy, because that's their best shot at pulling votes away from him.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago

Re: what's his nuts FBI director coming out and a couple weeks before Nov 2016 with that email scandal that also went absolutely nowhere

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The media may oblige. Clicks are clicks and the fourth estate is too hungry to worry about 2 years from now, it seems.

"Fairness."