206
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Generally the ATF cannot be brought up without a conservative making a joke about them killing dogs which is in reference to the Ruby Ridge standoff where they entrapped neo Nazi Randy Weaver into selling sawed off shotguns. He missed his court date and when they went to arrest him, US marshals came across his son, the son's friend, and his dog while in the woods. The marshals claim the dog was coming toward them to attack them and shot it. After the friend shot and killed a marshal, the son ran away up the hill and the remaining marshal shot him in the back and killed him.

So the joke does not even make sense since it was the US Marshals who killed the dog and started the standoff.

Conservatives also tend to go on and on about how if victims of law enforcement violence would have just complied, they would be fine. They don't recognize their cognitive dissonance with Ruby Ridge though since had Randy simply complied and made his court date, the stand off would not have happened.

This is not to defend the actions of the ATF, the US marshals, or the FBI, BTW. The ATF did a terrible operation. The US Marshals escalated it when it did not need to be escalated, and the FBI shot Randy a second time when he was retreating but the bullet also killed his wife who was holding their 10 month old.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

I don't think it's that deep in that particular, the ATF just likes shooting dogs, like all cops.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

From the people I asked, they specifically references Ruby Ridge. I probably have asked a good dozen people whenever I have heard the reference.

Odd that they seem to sympathize about the dog being shot but not the wife or son.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Don't know who you're asking but it's from police and feds shooting dogs all the time. There are tons of videos online of cops just popping dogs for no fucking reason.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Generally it was conservatives and/or gun nuts on reddit. Not one of them mentioned law enforcement overall and would downvote me when I mentioned police shoot a fuckton of dogs. Conservatives joke about the ATF specifically doing that.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

That's odd cause I'm on the gun subs on Reddit and minus the few FUDD dipshits who love daddy turnip and thin blue dicks, most of them are pretty "fuck the police" and "fedbois can suck it" types.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I think most of them would fall under the FUDD category.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

They conducted a sting, there's a lot wrong with how it was handled but he never denied making unlawful weapons and to add to that he was convicted of doing it prior to ruby ridge.

Let's not whitewash either side of this fence please.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Check out * Long Shadow - Season 2: Rise of the American Far Right*

Pretty disturbing how clear the line is from the past to now.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

fucksake. 😶

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Wait wasn't his name Randy Quade or somethin

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
206 points (96.8% liked)

News

22886 readers
4141 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS