Science Memes

10963 readers

2399 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1437

double slit (mander.xyz)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

That's not really it. You need something that measures the state of the electron. Merely looking in the direction is not enough. It has to be something that interacts with the electron.

A camera alone isn't enough. But light (eg photons) with enough energy should be enough. But then that energy will manipulate the electron. If you had a completely dark room and pointed a camera at the experiment it wouldn't change anything.

It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it turns out that slapping the electron around like with a big stick or whatever causes it to change its behavior, go figure! :-P

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Dammit Jim, I'm a psychologist, not a physicist!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So if we didn't need light to see it then it would continue doing whatever it does?

I wonder how the universe would look if we didn't need light to see 🤔

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

but light is seeing.