r/Ultralight

91 readers
1 users here now

r/Ultralight is the largest online Ultralight Backcountry Backpacking community! This sub is about overnight backcountry backpacking, with a focus...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/beerballchampion on 2024-04-07 04:06:53.


I just went to the thrift store and found a huge pile of these brushes (brand new in packaging) for $0.50 each. I snagged 2 of them. They weigh 10grams each and have both a comb and a hairbrush attachment. I’ve been looking for a UL hairbrush that was pretty light so figured I’d share! Pics here:

I also found them online at Walmart, link:

I have not used this on a long hike so take this information as you will.

2
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/davidhateshiking on 2024-04-05 17:44:54.


So I just recieved the following email:

We would like to confirm that the the Bullitt Satellite Messenger service is live and fully operational. Since being acquired in February 2024 by RCD 2023 Limited (a UK registered company), the service has continued without interruption and continues to be the world’s leading direct to device NTN messaging service.

As part of our investment, RCD is very pleased to confirm that it will honour the service agreements and data plans for the thousands of existing subscribers who signed up to the Bullitt Satellite Messenger service prior to April 3rd 2024. From April 3rd 2024, the following price plans will be immediately available to all new subscribers with others to follow:

SOS satellite assist only - $4.99 per month Everyday messaging (up to 80 messages per month) - $9.99 per month* Premium messaging (up to 300 messages per month) - $29.99 per month* Freedom (unto 250 messages per year) - $59.99 as one off annual payment*

*All messaging plans include SOS Satellite assist. Further information on data plans can be found on the bullitt.com website. For more information in other currencies please see website.

3
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/usethisoneforgear on 2024-04-02 04:58:57.

4
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/109thbead on 2024-04-02 01:52:21.


Prompted by a post yesterday from u/sunflowerpetal1, I decided to test out my intended method of long term trail laundry, Dr. Bronners. I had read that you could use it as detergent but hadn't tried it because I took those claims on faith. Silly me. I tested it out so that you don't have to.

I started off looking at the Dr. B's website and it said to use 1/3 cup of any of their castile soaps to do a small load. They then said if using a high efficiency washer, to cut that in half. I'm not sure if it was their website or other places, but I also read that you should dilute the soap, and add vinegar to the rinse cycle. So that's what I did.

I washed every item of my trail clothes that wasn't wool, down, or DWR coated in a high efficiency washer, with 1/6 cup of Dr. B's baby/unscented castile soap. I diluted just as much as the little soap compartment in the top would hold after that 1/6 cup of soap. I then filled the same washing machine cup thing with distilled white vinegar when it came time for the rinse cycle. I used the delicate cycle, cold/cold, low speed.

TL;Read later: It worked great! The washer didn't explode with suds, the clothes smell fresh but neutral, and they feel clean and not oily. I'm not sure I'd use it for down, wool, or DWR fabrics, just in case, but I feel confident relying on it for my typical wash days in town.

5
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/Chicken_Tramper on 2024-04-01 17:47:18.


Here at CTUG, we dedicate ourselves to solving problems for hikers on trail, even problems you didn't know you had. Our latest two products solve the essential problems of heavy packs and wet socks. Check out our new products, the Worn Weight Webbing Wardrobe and the Seco Sock Sock Dryer!

Worn Weight Webbing Wardrobe

Seco Sock - Sock Dryer

BUY YOURS NOW!

6
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/Boogada42 on 2024-04-01 09:07:16.

7
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/DeputySean on 2024-04-01 07:30:38.

8
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/aladdinparadis on 2024-03-29 21:47:45.


Let's discuss the various recommendations that are out there for washing down sleeping bags and try to make sense of it all.

Enlightened Equipment:

  • "No washing machines: Using a washing machine, of any kind, will void the warranty of all Enlightened Equipment products."
  • Recommend bathtub handwash + dryer (with tennis balls)

Feathered Friends:

  • Recommend washing machine + dryer (no mention of tennis balls)

Thermarest:

  • "Hang dry your bag whenever possible."
  • Recommend washing machine + hang drying (!!)

Cumulus:

  • Recommend bathtub handwash + dryer (with tennis balls)

Mountain Hardwear:

  • Recommend washing machine + dryer (no mention of tennis balls)
  • "Don't use liquid soap or detergent" (notable, as it contradicts most others)

Haglöfs:

  • "It is preferable to use down detergent (soap based) or a small amount – approx. 1/3 dose – of a mild liquid detergent"
  • Recommend machine wash + dryer (with tennis balls)
  • Recommend liquid detergent'

Pajak

  • "Down sleeping bags, just like clothes, should be dried flat by spreading it out horizontally on a dryer in a warm and airy place"
  • Recommend washing machine + flat drying (or tumble drying) (no mention of tennis balls)

Carinthia

  • "Do not put any tennis balls in the dryer."
  • Recommend washing machine + dryer (specifically without tennis balls)

Naturkompaniet (old outdoor gear company in sweden):

  • "With or without tennis balls? This is a question that comes up often and we do not recommend bringing tennis balls in the washing machine as there is no proven positive effect."

It's very confusing to know what is actually best practice, I wish there were more tests being done on this. Which recommendations do you favor and what do you think of the EE policy?

9
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/backpackTJ on 2024-03-29 22:54:08.


There is a common misconception that you should wedge your bear can somewhere so a bear can't move it.

I get it; I did the same thing for years until I learned I was wrong.

From the NPS:

Prepare food, eat, and store your bear-resistant food canister at least 100 yards downwind from your tent.

Store your canister on the ground hidden in brush or behind rocks.

Do not place canister near a cliff or water source. Bears may knock the canister around or roll it down a hill.

Watch for approaching bears. Be ready to quickly put your food away.

Keep your bear canister closed and locked, even when you are near your campsite. The bear canister only works when it is closed and locked!

Do not attach anything to the canister (ropes attached to the canister may allow a bear to carry it away).

If a bear can is wedged somewhere, a bear could use that leverage to open it. Bear cans are smooth and round to prevent the bear from getting a grip on them. Otherwise, the bear could rip the top off, smash it open, or gnaw through the plastic (depending on the specific can). If you wedge a bear can somewhere, you defeat the entire purpose of its design.

Look at this video of a grizzly trying to open a bear can:

The bear can't get it open because it's not in a fixed location; it's slipping and sliding everywhere.

If the can were in a fixed location, the bear's first problem of keeping the can in one place would be solved, making it much easier for the bear to solve the next problem: opening it.

Imagine trying to get the cap off a beer bottle without gripping it; it's impossible. As soon as you grip the bottle to keep it in place, it's incredibly easy to pop the top off. It's the same idea for a bear and a bear can (luckily, bears don't have opposable thumbs).

Obligatory images of failed bear storage (scroll down for the cans):

EDIT - I added a different set of NPS instructions recommending hiding the bear can. The instructions from the original post can be found here: (they're nearly identical)

10
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/Klasickk on 2024-03-27 22:23:41.


Hi All,

I'm weighing my options for my first ever "ultralight" level backpack, and I've landed on prioritizing comfort by sacrificing some weight and pursuing a backpack that has a frame and load lifters. I was fairly certain on the purchase of a Durston Kakwa 55, and now I'm slightly second guessing after seeing GG released new versions of their backpacks.

It seems like they've made improvements over their old models, primarily with redesigned load lifters, frame, hipbelt, and shoulder straps. However, the Mariposa still runs $315 brand new, which is a bit of a hefty price compared to a Durston.

Curious to see what the general ultralight community is feeling with these new bags. Thanks!

11
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/nunatak16 on 2024-03-28 03:34:32.


Yes I know I make and sell some of the stuff mentioned, but where else do I go for a discussion with a credible audience

Maybe dangerous for me to say here but I’m increasingly not into quilts with their fiddly straps, checking and tucking when turning and almost unavoidable drafts. It’s been a slow reckoning but of late with an exponential curve to it. A while ago I decided only above freezing will I pack a quilt; then July-August only aka 40°F. Now maybe not at all

This is the West. We have little moisture in the air to hold heat, it’s mostly solar radiation thru relatively cool air. So once the sun sets at altitude the temps drop fast. Same in the deserts during shoulder seasons. I don’t remember ever sticking a foot out to cool off, or peeling back half the torso to vent, some of the quilt virtues lauded here

So now I use a bag, zipper less and hoodless. I purposely choose a temp rating matching the warmer times of the season and add clothes to deal with the more frigid events. When it gets too cold for that I have an Alpha Direct lined DWR nylon ripstop hooded over-bag . The last resort is to slip into a VBL sack

VBL? Meant for winter above the arctic circle this is about the lightest way to get a temp boost in mild conditions too. Just apply it correctly. No naked skin or breathing inside the VBL bag, and use the top cord to regulate. Still, lots of folks who tries this tries it once, lol. Yeah it’s different

Using such a layering system is not saving me weight over a single high loft down unit, on the contrary actually, but being a tinkerer it’s satisfying to blend different tech and geek over their properties - while gaining a few advantages over a big puffy quilt:

I am laying on top of down too. This almost forgotten luxury feels so good

I have a wide temp range of comfort, maybe as much as 25-30°F without sticking limbs out into the night

For me it’s a set and forget system. No midnight adjusting of straps and cords and edges, besides the top cinch

Drafts are a thing of the past

Dewy cowboy camping, or prolonged rainy spells with the Alpha over-bag allows me to immediately stuff an almost dry down bag in the pack come morning. I’m into dawn starts so this should not be dismissed

The VBL further helps with having dry down

Things do get wet sometimes, despite all this talk. Three smaller individual items dries faster

Here’s a breakdown of what I brought to the Utah desert here in March for a 12 day'er. All size long/reg

VBL: 70g

Bag: 340g w 210g of 900 down. What’s this, 45°F, 50°F? Not sure as it was an experimental project finished the day before we left. Box baffled with tiny minuscule mesh walls, but still - I put more fill in my 3 season down pullover..

Alpha/ripstop over-bag: 290g. 60 GSM with 10d DWR shell. 24” zipper. Contoured hood with room for pillow. Pad goes outside where it belongs

Total 700g

Which is between a 10°F and 0°F Enigma and about equivalent to a roomy WM MegaLite 30°F mummy. (Wow, wait what..?)

Too heavy of course, but I was so comfortable after getting some practice with it all. Low was mid-twenties. We had dewy nights, rainy nights, snowy nights, cold clear nights and warm nights, ie perfect across the board conditions allowing me to use most available combos.

12
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/BarnabyWoods on 2024-03-27 04:07:18.


I just clicked a link on FB for some crazy 78% off deals on Darn Tough socks. The site looked exactly like Darn Tough's real site, and I was almost taken in. Just before entering my credit card info, I though to google it, and learned from that the site was just registered last week, and is in China, not Vermont. So, no sale, of course.

13
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/AceTracer on 2024-03-26 21:56:39.


I'm getting back on the PCT in a few weeks, so I decided to spend a couple days looking at what's out there right now. This spreadsheet has become outdated, with many of the options no longer available, and Nitecore not an option for me. If you love Nitecore, great, I'm happy for you. I've seen too many reliability issues on trail, it only has 2 ports, no display, and it's ridiculously expensive for what you get.

A note about price and reliability: none of these power banks are meant to take the abuse we put them through on a thru hike, so I can't fault any of them for failing in the field. However, when they do, you don't have time for a warranty replacement, you need a new power bank immediately and affordably. Preferably, it needs to be at your next town stop in a couple days via Amazon Prime and cost no more than $30ish.

Now then, the first contender is a power bank with a built-in wall plug and cables. It's what I've been using since Nov '21 for over 1500 miles of hiking including (some of) the PCT and three Caminos. The brand I've been using is Charmast, but I don't recommend it now simply because there are newer banks with slightly better technology. The brand I've been testing recently is ANOUV, which has an extra built in cable and can push/pull 18W from the USB C port. Here is a picture of me charging 5 devices while it also charges. Cost is about $20, and total weight including the built in cables and plug is 7.8 oz.

I've been pretty happy with this system, except that using the built-in plug it only charges at 10W, so it'll take 4+ hours to fully charge itself and longer if you're passthrough charging. That's fine for overnight stays, but not for quick town stops. You can charge quicker if you use the USB C port, but you'd need to find a capable USB C outlet or carry an extra 18W wall plug which defeats the purpose of having everything built in.

So, I started looking at faster charging solutions. The next most popular recommendation as of late is the Anker Nano. It charges at 30W, and will take about 1.5 hours to fully charge. It also has a built-in cable and two ports so you can charge up to 3 devices at once. Cost is currently $35 and weight is 7.7 oz. However, you need to buy a 30W wall plug and any extra cables you need. It's also the clunkiest size; small and thick.

This is...okay, but the major issue for me is that it doesn't do pass through charging. So I can't just hook everything up and forget about it; I need to charge it first and then charge my devices or use a multi-port plug or multiple plugs. This is a huge hassle, added weight, and cost. This is the option for you if you prioritize faster charge times and value a reliable brand name, but I don't know if it's worth the drawbacks.

Next, I looked at the Veektomx, the overall best power bank out there right now in terms of price, size, weight, and technology according to this recent video.

The Veektomx is currently $22 and weighs 6 oz. That's only slightly heavier than the Nitecore, except it also has a percentage display and an extra port. It'll fully charge in ~3 hours and it does have passthrough charging. I was able to charge from USB C at 19W and (oddly) the micro USB port between 10-15W depending on if I had anything else connected. You do have to carry a wall plug and extra cables, bringing the weight around the same as the other two options and no built-in cables means you can charge at most 2 devices. This is the viable option if you want the best combination of weight, size, price, and charge time at the cost of fiddlyness with having to switch out more devices to charge everything.

And that's it! I looked at literally hundreds of other options, including a lot of higher capacity power banks with better features, but none were worth pursuing due to price, weight, availability, feature set, etc.

More pics for comparison.

14
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/accatone23 on 2024-03-25 17:09:24.


Obviously just dropped today so I’m not expecting any actual reviews, but curious if this has piqued the interest of other hikers…?

Weight is amazing (3.2oz), pit zips are dope, price is reasonable.

Thoughts?

(Edit to add weight)

15
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/estreetpanda on 2024-03-23 22:12:10.


After four attempts to purchase the discontinued Slinglite from increasingly dubious online retailers, I used a VPN to get my UQ from Koln, Germany to London, England.

Then a relative put it in under the plane in their big bag when they came to Sydney. It arrived today after seven weeks.

16
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/laurk on 2024-03-22 16:26:06.


**Where: Grand Canyon - Escalante Route w/ u/dubbin64

**When: March 14 - 17, 2024

**Distance/Intinerary: 30mi, 13,800ft of elevation gain/loss Grand Canyon - Escalante

**Conditions: Snow, Rain, Mild Temps (34° to 55°), More water outside of the Colorado River than usual, No bugs, No sun. Not what I was imagining for a Grand Canyon trip :) but I loved this trip and would do it again and probably will take my wife here with me ASAP.

**LiarPack:

**Useful Info: Do not underestimate the miles in the GC. 10mi feels like 15mi. Some of the miles on this route are very slow even for a fast hiker and also demand climbing skills for the 3rd/4th class hiking. Also, the 5,100ft descent with a full pack will take its toll. Read the permit section below. Bring rodent protection for food or do a rodent hang and make sure all food is out of your pack.

**Photo Album:

**Trip Report:

Day 1: From SLC the day before, I camped somewhere near the border of Utah and Arizona on some BLM land. That morning I cruised on over to the Cliff Dwellers Lodge for breakfast. Highly recommend if you're doing a similar itinerary. More snow over Jacob Lake area and more snow on the rim of the Grand Canyon. Not ideal backpacking conditions. Visibility of my first time seeing the grand canyon was all of about 30 feet in front of me. Nevertheless, we shuttled our cars from Grand View to Lipan Point and headed down. We threw in some last minute items like micro spics and Ursacks for the mice. Both not necessary but we wanted to be prepared based on previous trip reports. Once we dropped about a 1000ft over a mile or so, we did a side trek up to Cardenas Butte where we scrambled and climbed our way up to the summit. Views were terrific and hiking temps were ideal. It significantly increased the sufferfest mindset to type-one fun hiking. The trail eased up in tripping hazards as we descended gradually now to the Colorado River. Packed small gravel and dirt trail was welcomed after several miles of slower trail. The clouds made for dramatic scenery and before we knew it we were at Tanner Beach. Taking careful note of the pit toilet location, we continued to our camping zone which was NE of Tanner Beach about a mile or so. The trail was difficult but fun as we contoured our way on shale cliff bands above the Colorado river. Not before long we were at our camp spot just at dusk. Warm dinners all around for our camp was a great way to cap a snowy start. A mountain house dinner for me night 1 to allow me to reuse the same mylar bag for my other dinners to keep my pot clean. Nice sleeping temps around 40s at night, and RAIN.

Day 2: The MLD Solomid XL was a great choice for this bugless trip. I had just a zpacks solo ground sheet and the solomid. The low pitch prevented splash-back of the sand and held up in the winds that increased in the morning. The half zipped fly while the corner extended to the tie-back loop was nice in the morning while it was raining. It allowed me to cook my oatmeal and coffee without getting anything wet inside. The rain stayed hard and steady that morning and each of us stayed inside our shelters until around 9:30am. While I was lying there for hours in the morning wondering if we will ever see the sun again, I noticed two slow-small leaks in the two locations near the top of the mid. Otherwise my seam sealing job was good, but still annoyed I had an action item when I returned home. Something I never had to think about with my DCF shelters. I did enjoy the quieter pitter patter of the rain on this SilPoly shelter though. Anyway… we packed up sad and wet and hiked our way back to Tanner beach and onward to our next destination. Solid 2 hours or more of hiking in the rain. A cold and wet lunch stop with beautiful views was short due to the chills brought on by cooling sweat. The rain didn’t last and definitely didn’t define the day as a whole. We hiked along dramatic landscapes as we climbed away from the Colorado River to the mid elevations. By now I was truly impressed with the variety this canyon had to offer. Three distinct zones to me; the rim trees and snow and rocks, the mid section desert with cacti and plants abundant, the low elevation beaches along the Colorado River lush with plant life. Truly amazing. Our smooth trail brought us to Escalante Creek where we crossed and descended along side it back down to the mighty Colorado. Our campsite was once again void of any people and we were happy to have more of a pea gravel/soil site. This ground here didn’t cling to my stuff like the sand of the first night and driving a stake in felt easy and secure. The white noise of the rapids nearby were so loud you had to raise your voice to converse from tent to tent. I was starting to miss the quiet away from the river. Skurka and his beans and rice were had that night.

Day 3: Some more rain in the night. A easy morning packing up. Our trail took us a bit higher above the Colorado River above some cliff bands. The trail takes a hard turn away from the river as you hike along the top of the slot canyon of Seventy-Five Mile Creek. One of the cooler sections of this whole route as you stand above the was you are about to enter. A fun but slick 25ft 3rd class descent to the wash bottom before cruising in side the canyon you were once on top of back down to the Colorado River. A short snack break while we awed at the straight up wall we had to tackle next. About 30’ of 4th class climbing to get you on top of the cliff bands. Short but super fun followed by a technical steep descent down a wash to Hance Rapids area. The theme of this whole route was easy hiking to technical hiking then back to easy hiking then technical hiking. A nice variety, but this aint the PCT. This route demands some substantial physical ability. If you were at all wigged out by heights or can’t easily climb 4th class I would reconsider. Not long after the Papago Creek technical section we took a lunch break at Nance Rapids beach area where the New Hance Trail/Red Canyon area joins the East Tonto Trail. Watching the white-water folks take on this challenging section of river was one of the best lunch time backpacking entertainment I have ever experienced. We continued up nice trail away from the river above Mineral Canyon and Hance Creek Canyon. A terrific section with a variety of cacti. The lush green leaves at the Hance Creek camp site was stark. This was a lovely camp with fresh clear water flowing that wasn’t the silty Colorado for once. Bold mice live here so beware. Nighttime temps were hovering just above freezing. Our coldest night. No match for the 18° Sastrugi.

Day 4: Woke up around 6am for a quick(er) departure since I had a long drive ahead of me back to SLC. Beautiful hiking with no clouds for once. But still no sun beneath the shade of the south rim. By the time we go to the rim clouds had rolled in lol. Hiking this day was a lot of elevation. About 3,800ft to 7,400ft I believe. 3,600ft in 4mi about if my quick mental math is correct. The mine on Horseshoe Mesa was cool. Views were amazing and at this point I had wished we had got a permit up at Horseshoe Mesa camp. As we climbed higher the snow/ice was more of a obstacle. I did not need spikes at the start of this trip or at the end but they were good to have. Both of the other guys put them on and happy they did. The final switch backs on the upper portion with snow/ice were exposed and one slip would be a disaster. At last we crested the top at Grandview TH and not more than 6 to 8 people up there given the snow and ice maybe? Now is a good time to say that we saw maybe 2 people on the trail the entire trip. 6 people at Tanner Beach camp but none at any of our campsites.

**Closing Remarks: You could easily shorten this trip up to 2 nights, 3 days. Just don’t underestimate the descent down to the river from the rim on day one. And don't underestimate the slow miles of technical trail that break up the cruiser miles along and occasionally above the river. I was happy to take it easy with my friends as the first backpacking trip of the year and appreciate the beautiful views. Try to camp in not popular areas if you don’t want to deal with the mice. They are bold!

**Permits for this trip are confusing IMO. is where you get them and you have to select "requires adv(anced) GC experience or unusual." You treat the green "w" as basically available and have to call the ranger with a small resume via email to the ranger which they will pull up when you call them. I did not get the permits so I'm not exactly sure which office to call but I believe it is the GC backcountry office. My friend got these permits on Dec. 29th I believe. All permits were for the general area. here is the camping area layout. Permitted areas for this itinerary were BA9, BC9, BE9. If shortening it to 2 nights I would do BC9 and BE9. Camping has these large zones but very few camping spots, especially near water, actually exist. Really just the washes and by the beaches near the Colorado River. Much of the hiking has un-camp-able ground so keep that in mind.

**Gear Notes: Loved all my gear for this trip. The Z-P...


Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/Ultralight/comments/1bl1x73/trip_report_first_time_in_the_grand_canyon_low/

17
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/FireWatchWife on 2024-03-20 15:42:42.


A lot of reading and thinking about ultralight backpacking has led me to believe that there are actually two very different philosophies hiding under the name "ultralight".

The first I'll call quant or hard ultralight. This is based on keeping base weight below a hard number, usually 10 pounds. Trip goals are very narrow and focused, usually involving thru-hikes or other long-distance hikes. Those who subscribe to this philosophy tend to hike long days, spend minimal time in camp, and have no interest in other activites (fishing, cooking special camp meals, etc.) If a trip goal is proposed that would increase base weight, the common response is to reject that goal and simplify the trip. While this philosophy exists in many different regions, it is strongest in western North America. This approach is extremely well-represented in posts on this group.

The second I'll call qual or soft ultralight. This is based on carrying the minimum possible base weight for a given set of trip goals. Depending on the goals, that minimum may be much more than 10 lbs. (Packrafting is a good example.) This group often plans to hike shorter distances and spend more time in camp. They don't want to carry unnecessary weight, and the additional gear needed for fishing, nature photography, cooking great meals, packrafting, etc. means they want to reduce the weight of other gear as much as possible. This approach is less commonly seen in posts on this group, but there are enough such posts to know that this group can also be found on the subreddit.

At times I think the two groups are talking past each other. The "hard" group doesn't care about anything but hiking for hiking's sake, and will sacrifice both comfort and trip goals to meet its objectives of low weight and long distances covered. The "soft" group doesn't care about thru-hiking, and will sacrifice super-low pack weights (while still aiming for low weight wherever it doesn't impact their goals) to help them be happy, comfortable, and able to engage in their preferred non-hiking activity in the backcountry.

What do you think?

18
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/Mediocre_Rush_4592 on 2024-03-17 21:40:45.


So I(24F 5’8 135p) just did an overnight 10 mile backpacking hike to test out all my gear and I am super disappointed because after going about a half mile I realized real quick that my pack was heavy as crap and killing my shoulders. I’m trying to prepare for a 40 mile trip that I’m taking in May and there’s no way I can get through that trip with how heavy my pack was or maybe I’m just not used to backpacking and need to toughen up? I’ll just list everything that I carried and how much it weighed so hopefully y’all can give me some advice on how to drop weight

•Backpack: Fjallraven Singi 48L 4.63lbs plus 12oz for side pockets

•Tent: Big agnes copper spur hv ul2 3lbs 2oz

•Sleeping pad: Sea to summit ether lite 1lb 6oz

.Sleeping bag: western mountaineering terralite 25F 1lb 2oz

•Bestargot titanium French press: 7.05oz

•Pillow: Sea to summit large foamcore pillow: 10.6oz

•Headlamp: black diamond battery powered 2.73oz

•Jacket: Fjallraven expedition latt hoodie: 14.8oz

•Rain jacket: Columbia switchback 3 don’t know the weight but it’s super light

•Water filter: Grayl 24oz geopress: 15.9oz and a membrane solutions life straw(I plan on switching to just a sawyer squeeze instead of all that) carried an extra smart water also

•I also carried a gun which was way too heavy so never again and also a 25 foot paracord, a carabiner, ferro rod, mini bic lighter, plastic spork, paper map, a poncho, hand towel, first aid kit with bandaids, emergency blanket, moleskin, tweezers, and Benadryl cream, sunscreen stick, small bugspray, small hand sanitizer and small roll of toilet paper, sleep shirt and pants, and extra socks. I think that’s all I carried and my husband carried the food and stove kit with fuel along with his load. So I would definitely appreciate the advice on what to do. Should I get a lighter bag and tent? I really hate to spend more money after just recently buying all of this stuff.

Location: will be in Georgia so pretty hot weather in May

Goal base weight: under 15lbs

Budget: no budget so far

I’m looking to: potentially upgrade my items and maybe leave some stuff at home

Non negotiable items: sleeping pad( I love my sleeping pad)

Will be carrying my load solo in May

Thanks!

EDIT: Thanks for all the helpful comments! I’m now looking at ultralight packs and an ultralight trekking pole tent. My options for a pack is #1 GG Gorilla 50L but they are out of stock and I’m concerned about the durability. #2 Outdoor vitals CS40 pack but it sure is expensive. #3 a custom Atom pack but I haven’t looked too far into this one yet. Any help regarding these packs would be much appreciated. For a tent I’m considering the GG the one tent because it seems good for the price. But I’m also considering a Durston Xmid pro1 but the price is crazy so I don’t know if I wanna pull the plug on that one and for both of these I’m concerned about condensation. Sorry for the late reply I just had to do some research first.

19
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/Common_Mushroom9491 on 2024-03-15 02:19:28.


This is the third update for this fantastic pack.

  • vastly improved side compression system
  • daisy chain attachment points
  • dual ice axe loops
  • embroidered design

However...

  • same material: 210d EXTREEMA Recycled Nylon Ripstop (UHMPE). Was really expecting Ultra...
  • therefore same weight: 1lb 13oz (822 grams) with accessories, 1lb 11oz (765 grams) without accessories. You can remove the frame.

I've been enjoying the 2021 version a lot.

20
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/ScootyHoofdorp on 2024-03-14 14:15:47.


"You're still good even if you lose or break a trekking pole" is an oft cited benefit for 1 pole trekking pole tents vs 2 pole trekking pole tents. I've always wondered how big of a consideration that should really be in choosing a tent. so I'm interested in hearing your stories. Has this ever happened to you? How did you handle the situation?

21
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/Boogada42 on 2023-12-02 21:29:04.


Need suggestions on where to hike? Want beta on your upcoming trip? Want to find someone to hike with? Have a quick trip report with a few pictures you want to share? This is the thread for you! We want to use this for geographic-specific questions about a trail, area etc. or just sharing what you got up to on the weekend.

If you have a longer trip report, we still want you to make a standalone post! However, if you just want to write out some quick notes about a recent trip, then this is the place to be!

22
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/BeckyRoyal on 2024-03-10 12:41:03.


No low effort, just genuinely asking

23
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/GoSox2525 on 2024-03-10 07:14:29.


Finally got my tarp! Borah 7x9 Silpoly. I'm really excited to give it a shakedown. I spent a few hours today trying out different pitches. It was frustrating and very tiring work! But also satisfying when you finally get the shape right.

I figured I would save weight, favor simplicity, and gain some skills by working with only knots. I'm a climber and am generally familiar with an inventory of hitches and knots, so I really thought this would be perfectly enjoyable. Bowline to fix the lines to the tarp loops. I tried Truckers hitches, McCarthy hitches, and taut-line hitches to tension the lines on the stakes. I'm using 1.5 mm dyneema cord. Some observations:

  • taut-line hitches are really annoying to untie from a cord this thin, and I'll probably never use them again. I'm lucky that I have long fingernails right now, because I usually don't. A big load-releasable knot e.g. slip is so much better and easier to use.
  • both the McCarthy and truckers hitch are easy enough and hold well. However, I already tore through the sheath on one of the ridge line guylines using a trucker's hitch, and I'm seeing fraying at the tarp-end Bowlines as well! This actually seems unavoidable; 1.5 mm line is so thin that it acts like a saw when pulling tension into the line. How do people avoid this?? I can think of a few ways to mitigate the friction, but they all involve not really taking advantage of the 3-1 that you've created.
  • 8 ft of cord at the tarp corners seems like too much
  • 10 ft of cord for the ridgeline is good, if anything not quite enough
  • clove hitching to the poles works well
  • I decided to switch from Bowlines to mini Litesmith carabiners for just the ridgeline cords. This was actually very nice, since different pitches require the position of the poles to be moved around. I didn't do this on the corners since they won't move

Anyway, my conclusions are that I actually hated doing this with knots. It was really not enjoyable, not efficient, and not even sensible when line-locs exist. It uses more cord length, puts the cord at risk of damaging friction, and takes longer than it needs to, especially when you're constantly adjusting corners.

I'll like switch to 2-2.5mm line, shorter cord sections, and line-locs. Specifically, the best choice seems to be line-loc Vs (or similar) at the tarp loops. That way gives you adjustability over essentially the entire length of the cord. This would primarily work at the corners. For the poles, the tensioning generally happens at the stake and not at the tarp, so there, micro line-locs might be needed. Or just tie semi-permanent taut like hitches that I won't untie.

Am I totally dumb? Was I doing something wrong? Has anyone else come to similar conclusions?

24
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/AlfredRowley on 2024-03-09 23:50:23.


I'm currently bikepacking, not hiking, but I figured this might be the best place to ask.

Because I'm travelling long-term, I mix up sleeping in a tent with sleeping in hotels quite often, which means sometimes I don't use my down sleeping bag for days on end.

For the last 2 months I have been taking the sleeping bag out of the stuffsack every couple of days just to let the down "breathe", even though I don't always use it for sleeping. Lately I was hesitating if this is actually a healthy practice.

Here is why I think it might not be good for the down: Like many materials, I can imagine that the down fibers have some kind of "fatigue" limit. By stuffing it and taking it back out of the bag many times the fibers compress and decompress many times and ultimately lose loft. I think maybe it might be better to leave the sleeping bag in its stuffsack when I sleep in hotels, just to reduce the amount of compression cycles the down would have to go through. Then I would only take the bag out when truly necessary.

Does this make sense? Or was I just doing fine taking the bag out of the compression sack every once in a while?

Thanks!

25
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/Ultralight by /u/FuguSandwich on 2024-03-07 19:16:13.


I bought a Spark 1 (40F) a few months back on a great sale, mainly as a just-in-case bag for day hikes in the wilderness. Saw they discontinued them a few weeks back and then today got the email that the "new and improved" ones are here. Was bummed that I possibly bought an inferior version, but that seems to not be the case.

Old Spark 1:

40F EN Lower Limit

Bag Weight 12 oz

Fill Weight 6.3 oz 850FP

Compressed Volume 1.5L

New Spark 45

45F EN Lower Limit

Bag Weight 12.8 oz

Fill Weight 5.3oz 850+FP

Compressed Volume 2.4L

So it got heavier, bulkier, and colder while the price remained the same. Looks like they made it slightly bigger (admittedly the one I have is a bit tight) and switched from 10D face/7D Liner to 10D for both.

Most of the other models experienced similar.

view more: next ›