Hi all, because this instance has tended to be somewhat unreliable, we'll be concentrating on the magazine at https://kbin.social/m/FediPact

Thanks for understanding during this whirlwind, hope to see you there :)

fedidb.org no longer has a list of FediPact instances for some reason.

The list below is being updated manually, so if an instance is incorrectly listed, or its signup status has changed, please let me know.

Sizes are MAU.

Asterisk denotes instance that is not on the official FediPact list, but has made a public announcement.

I've limited this list to instances with 25+ members in order to avoid both overwhelming readers, as well as the smaller communities that may not be able to scale up as quickly, or might otherwise find this disruptive. If you'd like your instance to be on this list, please let me know and I'll add it :)

full list of FediPact instances at https://fedipact.online/ (and as always, thanks to @[email protected] for her amazing work!)

INSTANCE SIZE SIGNUPS?

• mas.to 24633 yes *will block initially and gauge effect
• mastodon.nl 7592 yes
• piaille.fr 7344 yes *"wait and see" with "very negative" outlook on meta
• kolektiva.social 6719 yes *announced publicly
• mastodon.art 6088 yes
• pixelfed.social 6571 no
• chaos.social 5876 no *announced publicly
• mastodon.scot 5232 yes *will block initially and gauge effect
• nrw.social 4856 yes
• tech.lgbt 4400 yes
• mastodon.ie 3986 yes
• aus.social 3717 yes *announced publicly
• beehaw.org 2408 yes
• botsin.space 2383 yes
• mathstodon.xyz 2285 yes *will block initially before determining future steps
• mastodon.nz 2280 yes
• pixelfed.de 1761 yes
• eldritch.cafe 1502 no
• climatejustice.social 1485 yes *announced publicly
• livellosegreto.it 1307 yes
• mastodon.radio 1034 yes
• wien.rocks 1027 yes *announced publicly
• octodon.social 1019 no
• rollenspiel.social 898 yes
• yiff.life 791 no *announced publicly
• todon.eu 739 no
• mastodon.eus 727 yes
• blahaj.zone 669 yes *announced publicly
• bark.lgbt 642 yes
• lemmy.dbzer0.com 598 no
• queer.party 597 no
• discuss.systems 594 yes
• vis.social 589 yes *announced publicly
• kind.social 525 yes *will block initially and consult members before any change to that policy
• social.coop 511 yes
• sunny.garden 502 yes *announced publicly
• toot.cat 442 yes
• todon.nl 430 no
• bsd.network 429 no
• types.pl 419 yes
• ludosphere.fr 415 yes
• feddit.nl 407 yes
• oldbytes.space 386 yes
• scicomm.xyz 385 yes *announced publicly
• mspsocial.net 364 no
• merveilles.town 360 no
• sociale.network 361 no
• freeradical.zone 358 no
• libretooth.gr 358 yes
• veganism.social 357 yes
• retro.pizza 344 yes
• mastodon.design 341 yes
• xarxa.cloud 328 yes
• tabletop.social 313 no
• 4bear.com 306 yes
• vulpine.club 283 no
• tenforward.social 255 yes
• toot.site 249 yes
• aussie.zone 246 no
• stop.voring.me 242 yes
• esperanto.masto.host 237 yes
• funami.tech 230 yes
• hackers.town 225 no
• is.nota.live 222 yes
• toot.portes-imaginaire.org 219 yes
• mograph.social 217 yes
• eightpoint.app 210 yes
• lounge.town 210 yes
• functional.cafe 210 yes
• babka.social 208 yes
• oc.todon.fr 208 yes
• strangeobject.space 207 no
• dragonscave.space 204 yes
• corteximplant.com 201 yes
• plush.city 191 yes
• toot.si 190 no
• dmv.community 190 yes *will silence meta instance(s)
• kfem.cat 176 yes
• genart.social 175 no
• fedi.at 163 yes *announced publicly
• mastobate.social 158 yes
• pl.nulled.red 158 ? no
• musicians.today 154 yes
• icosahedron.website 152 no
• outdoors.lgbt 150 yes *announced publicly
• toki.social 148 yes
• egirls.gay 145 ?
• mk.absturztau.be 143 yes
• mastodon.education 143 yes
• sunbeam.city 143 no
• cloudisland.nz 140 no
• mastodonmusic.social 138 yes
• unstable.icu 138 yes
• catcatnya.com 135 yes
• pagan.plus 135 yes
• mastodon.mit.edu 133 yes
• aoir.social 132 no
• lingo.lol 131 yes
• hispagatos.space 130 yes
• smashingly.gay 130 yes
• snowdin.town 123 no
• dftba.club 119 yes
• pony.social 118 yes
• toot.garden 112 yes
• hellsite.site 111 no
• gensokyo.social 109 yes
• wobbl.xyz 108 yes
• cathode.church 106 yes
• climatejustice.rocks 103 yes *announced publicly
• climatejustice.global 100 yes *announced publicly
• kafeneio.social 99 yes
• indiepocalypse.social 93 yes
• anticapitalist.party 89 no
• pounced-on.me 88 yes
• pipou.academy 84 yes
• pawb.social 82 no
• mastodon.com.pl 80 yes
• recurse.social 80 no
• fedi196.gay 77 yes
• tacobelllabs.net 76 yes
• tooters.org 76 yes *announced publicly
• queer.group 75 no
• deadinsi.de 74 yes
• lgbt.io 74 no
• indieauthors.social 72 yes
• fandom.garden 70 no
• sonomu.club 68 yes
• meemu.org 65 yes
• super-gay.co 64 yes
• rage.love 62 no
• efdn.club 61 yes
• pixelfed.art 61 yes
• toot.lgbt 60 yes
• solarpunk.moe 59 yes
• procursus.social 58 yes
• theexpan.se 58 yes
• polyglot.city 56 yes
• india.goonj.xyz 56 yes
• matapacos.dog 56 yes
• nightcity.bar 55 yes
• skastodon.com 54 yes
• bantu.social 54 no
• kitsunes.gay 52 yes
• luzeed.org 51 yes
• beach.city 49 yes
• transfur.social 49 yes
• gnusocial.net 45 yes
• kitsunes.club 44 yes
• craftodon.social 42 yes
• nixnet.social 41 yes
• floofy.tech 41 yes
• chilemasto.casa 41 yes
• autistics.life 39 yes
• pleroma.envs.net 39 yes
• cyberpunk.pics 39 yes
• flipping.rocks 37 yes
• ilyamikcoder.com 37 yes
• bookwyrm.gatti.ninja 37 yes
• iusearchlinux.fyi 33 yes
• 0w0.is 32 no
• blobfox.coffee 32 yes
• girldick.gay 31 yes
• evil.social 31 yes
• comicscamp.club 31 no
• simcha.lgbt 30 yes
• Discordian.social 30 yes
• laserdisc.party 30 no
• systerserver.town 30 yes
• WEATHERISHAPPENING.NETWORK 29 yes
• cutie.city 28 yes
• lediver.se 28 yes
• slime.global 27 no
• donotsta.re 27 yes
• tsukihi.me 27 yes
• seafoam.space 25 yes
• gamemaking.social 25 yes

Meta's upcoming 'P92' app is reported to have ActivityPub compatibility (link)

Many users and admins are opposed to federating with Meta, due to concerns including, but not limited to:

• user tracking, privacy violations, and data collection (link 1, 2, 3, 4)

• embrace-extend-extinguish behaviour (link)

• poor moderation

• corporate influence over the ActivityPub protocol

• centralization of the userbase around a single server

• psychological manipulation (link) of users via algorithm

• monopolistic behaviour (link)

• intentionally allowing (and profiting from!) anti-Black racism (link 1, 2)

• poor treatment of workers (link)

• facilitation of genocide on Facebook (link)

• failing to mitigate the distribution of CSAM on its platforms (link)

• New, June 16th allowing scams to proliferate on their platforms despite user attempts to file reports (link)

• New, June 16th rolling back COVID misinformation rules (link)

• New, July 1st putting the onus on parents/guardians to protect kids from online predators (link)

• a long history of breaching user trust (link)

In order to continue to build a new kind of social media, which prioritizes users over profits, and openness over walled gardens, we need to stand together in opposition to Meta's digital colonization effort.

What's making it difficult to form a consensus is that most admins haven't been communicating with users about what they plan to do (let alone asking the users what they want).

So, one very easy thing we can do is ask our admins if they're planning to block Meta, and if they aren't, ask them to reconsider.