this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
107 points (81.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6620 readers
447 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does she not understand that they'd behead her, supporter or not?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This is very common but so weird. Like lgbtq+ supporting communism, tards supporting nazism etc, brother they wont and historically speaking haven't hesitated on camping you day 1.

What is wrong with these people

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

There is nothing inharently anti-lgbtq about communism. There is with fascism. Fascism relies on a cultural mythology to appeals to some form of purity, which usually won't include LGBTQ+ people because that's relatively recently accepted.

Communism doesn't have any of that. It may include it on a case-by-case basis, but so do capitalist nations and democracies. Just look at the US for that.

I'm tired of the very basic "communism bad" takes. I thought we were done with that. You can build an argument against it if you want to. It's not hard. Just saying it's a boogeyman who causes all the problems isn't one though

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's spectacularly tone deaf to say anything positive about Hamas after they slaughtered civilians in cold blood.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So then we shouldn't say anything nice about Israel? They've killed Palestinians at a rate of something like 7 to 1.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seriously. Why can't people wrap their heads around the idea that both of these fundamentalist religious groups suck and should be kept from power.

I swear people think super villains are cartoonishly evil people. No. They're just supremely self-righteous people. And theres no quicker road to being a self righteous cunt than to believe you are gods chosen.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This is how I explained it to my parents when they asked me what was going on

Two groups of assholes murdering a bunch of Innocents while arguing over which sucks more

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, why would we?

It's possible to think both the Israeli government and Hamas are trash.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Yeah, truly no good guys in this fight, just dead civilians

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

criticizing current israeli govt is pretty common and level headed take: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/4544312

7:1 ratio

whose numbers are you using, there could be some sketchy methodology involved

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

According to the United Nations, roughly 6,400 Palestinians and 300 Israelis had been killed in the ongoing conflict since 2008, not counting the recent fatalities.

6400/300 in 200 You right, it's 21 to 1.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Honestly, yeah. At least about the Israeli government.

Unless you are a damn hypocrite, you shouldn't accept anyone committing war crimes, killing civilians and so on.

Obviously supporting a terror organization is also horrible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"Such a waste of fucken time"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fired from what? AFAIK her "day job" is pretty lucrative and I think she's self-employed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She was fired by Playboy. Apparently that's who actually ran her OF.

It's not like she couldn't make her own, without them, tho. I don't think her politics are gonna stop horny dudes wanting to see her naked. Shit some of them might even be in the IDF.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you're talking about porn, she hasn't done porn in many years, and apparently didn't make much money from it either despite getting a lot of views.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This site also said a coordinator for the Chicago Bears had his house raided by the FBI so I'm gonna say it'll post any old shit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair, the site posts garbage, but she really did post on Twitter calling them "freedom fighters" and that they should film horizontally to get better footage (of the atrocities??)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Jesus, and I emphasize, fucking Christ.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Well, it's fair to say the woman has some issues.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The only thing being pounded harder than the Gaza strip today is this bitch.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I've seen her naked

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It’s one thing to support Palestine’s right to exist. It’s another thing to justify and celebrate war crimes committed by a rebel occupation of a part of it that invite even more suffering of that country’s impoverished, defenseless civilians at the hands of an enemy that has historically had zero qualms about routinely making their lives a living hell over far less.

load more comments
view more: next ›