this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
411 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump's sharing of alleged classified intelligence to Russian officials in the White House has come under scrutiny amid a large-scale attack by the Hamas Islamist military group against Israel.

In May 2017, the former president defended his actions after he was found to have discussed sensitive details about an alleged Islamic State (ISIS) plot with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the Oval Office. Trump said he had an absolute right to do so. The intel was said to have been provided to the U.S. from Israel.

It was suggested at the time that the former president's handing over sensitive information from Israel could have damaged the relationship between the two countries. It also could have raised the possibility that the details could be passed from Russia to Iran, the Gulf nation that is a fierce adversary of Israel and has long supported Hamas.

On Saturday, Hamas, designated a terrorist group by the U.S. and the European Union, launched a large-scale attack against Israel, resulting in the deadliest day of violence in the Israel-Palestine conflict for decades. More than 700 people have been killed in Israel, and a further 400 in Gaza, since the incursion by Hamas, according to the Associated Press.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Still, a third of the country wants him back in the oval; proving once again, the power of propaganda.

Looking at you, Fox.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They don't even know why they want him, aside from spite for anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Because he's the only Republican with a chance of winning. Which is damn pathetic.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To own the libs. That’s about the extent of it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Last time, they literally ran "make liberals cry again" as a campaign slogan.

I'm not talking about random Trumpsters - this was spread by the Trump campaign itself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I saw a news clip of some woman being interviewed who said he was gods messenger.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It’s disturbing but I think it’s more than a third… other than organized religion … there is no bigger cult.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not trying to incite violence, suggest death by firing squad, or violate any community rules, but maybe he should be held accountable.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If this is confirmed, I don’t think the Secret Service would be able to protect him from Mossad.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tbh, given their reputation in recent years, I wouldn’t trust the secret service to protect anyone from a serious, skilled, well-organized and -equipped, state-backed covert force. And the state we’re talking about here is considered to have arguably the most effective and ruthless covert foreign intelligence/action service in the world.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given the last few days, I think we also shouldn't overestimate the capabilities of Israeli intelligence services.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Let me put this another way: the covert retaliation operation that I’m SURE Mossad is planning this very second is going to make the retribution they did for the 1972 Munich massacre look like a polite conversation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I understand the thought, but the idea of another country assassinating a former US president on American soil is pretty far fetched. That would almost certainly put that country in a fighting war with the US, regardless of who's in office.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They probably won’t do anything on US soil, but if he decides to flee prosecution in the US, he’s fair game.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Didn’t stop ksa from killing Kashoggi on Turkish soil and their relationship is complicated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lol you’re suggesting mossad would assassinate trump? That’ll be the day.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Sounds completely on brand

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is Netanyahu's fault.

"In the spring of 2016, no issue was more important to Benjamin Netanyahu than Donald Trump winning the White House."

With so much on the line, Netanyahu appears to have made a drastic decision. He would dispatch a discreet, highly trusted aide, armed with critical intelligence, to covertly “intervene” in the US election to help put his man Trump in the White House. Based on the FBI documents, the intelligence appears to have consisted of advance knowledge of Russia’s hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, and it may have included confidential details from the stolen e-mails. It was likely obtained by Israeli eavesdropping operations that were targeting secret Russian communications, as well as those of WikiLeaks.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure ol'Ben isn't too upset over the attacks. It didn't hurt him personally, and gives him a reason to escalate.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

I'm tired, boss. I'm tired of the blatant corruption, and the toothless retorts. Throw them in prison if you mean it, if not what are we waiting for? Mask off this bitch and show us the truth.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Donald Trump's sharing of alleged classified intelligence to Russian officials in the White House has come under scrutiny amid a large-scale attack by the Hamas Islamist military group against Israel.

In May 2017, the former president defended his actions after he was found to have discussed sensitive details about an alleged Islamic State (ISIS) plot with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the Oval Office.

On Saturday, Hamas, designated a terrorist group by the U.S. and the European Union, launched a large-scale attack against Israel, resulting in the deadliest day of violence in the Israel-Palestine conflict for decades.

Allison Gill, who tweets using the account for the Mueller, She Wrote podcast, added: "Don't forget: Trump gave Israeli intelligence to Russians in the Oval Office 6 years ago.

"As president, I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled WH meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety," Trump wrote.

Trump is due to go on trial in May 2024 accused of retaining classified documents after he left the White House in January 2021, and then obstructing the federal attempt to retrieve them from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Springs, Florida.


The original article contains 622 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago

I love how far out of scope everyone is willing to look to find a way to blame trump.