this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
650 points (99.5% liked)

HistoryPorn

4903 readers
231 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I want to see a MUCH higher resolution version of this photo. To study both that Wall-mounted proton pack and that exquisite hat.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The future was stolen from us a century ago.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I remember learning from a teacher that the oil companies basically bought up transit lines and ripped up streetcar tracks as well as killing the electric car. It explains why my city struggles so hard to build subways and street car lines. There must still be lots of money lining pockets to keep the gasoline flowing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Yep, big oil, auto manufacturers (who wanted to line their pockets), and politicians (who wanted to suburbanize / facilitate white flight from the cities) all colluded to divide the American public with dangerous roads and freeways, and sell us the machinery we'd need to navigate them.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Mr. Roger's also did a whole show on riding around in one of his buddies electric cars.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Here, allow me to put that errant apostrophe where it belongs:

*Rogers

*buddy's

You're welcome. I'll take my downvotes now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure it would be "one of his buddies'" and not "one of his buddy's" because it's "one of his buddies" that had a car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

My high school had an EV racing team in the 90s.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 3 days ago (4 children)

From a 110 year old book I picked up recently:

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm fairly convinced that the reason internal combustion won - even though it would regularly break your wrist when you started it - was that it made loud noises.

Back then cars were a luxury, and if you're buying something flashy you want people to notice you. A gasoline engine sputtering down the road would draw far more attention than an electric motor, so people bought those.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From an engineering standpoint, liquid fuels have a far greater energy-to-weight ratio than batteries. Some of the largest advancements in combustion engines for the purpose of conveyance were made during the world wars. Noise was something they actively fought against. Loud tanks are scary, but unexpected tanks are much scarier. If they really needed it to be loud, sirens exist (see: Jericho siren). The energy-to-weight problem is only now finally being solved via modern batteries using exotic materials and processes well outside of early 1900's technology.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's the textbook answer but I think mine is more fun.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh certainly! I only felt the need to add the textbook answer because of the... Conspiratorial side of Lemmy that will happily believe misleading information as long as it confirms pre-existing biases.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's too late, I've already accepted the other response as accurate gospel

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A gasoline engine sputtering down the road would draw far more attention than an electric motor, so people bought those.

They're still doing exactly this. ICE designs have never been quieter, but meanwhile Ford and GM are pumping out the L O U D E S T car options in decades.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've said adoption of EVs by that crowd will only come when they start slapping very loud and aggressive VESS options onto them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The hardware is already there, someone just needs to mod/hack that in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_vehicle_warning_sounds

In fact, it looks like we were going to get custom sound effects but the DOT killed it:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/07/13/2022-14733/federal-motor-vehicle-safety-standards-minimum-sound-requirements-for-hybrid-and-electric-vehicles

The agency has chosen not to adopt the remaining portions of the NPRM, including a proposal which would have allowed manufactures of hybrid and electric vehicles (HEVs) to install a number of driver-selectable pedestrian alert sounds in each HEV they manufacture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To be fair BMW and VAG/AUDI put factory pop and crackle modes (intentional over fueling/backfires) in their cars too.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

Fun to remember that Mr. Toad was a parody of all the dicks who drove cars.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It’s interesting to see this and be reminded that 110 years ago electricity was more readily available than gasoline. It took time for gas stations to become widespread. Even in the post-WWII era it was not uncommon for drivers to encounter signs warning that the last gas station was approaching and there would be no more for another 60+ miles (100+ kilometers, I suppose). It took decades to expand the gasoline distribution network.

In one sense electric vehicles are in the same boat today, at least in the US. From the standpoint of being able to charge at home, electric is more convenient and current models on sale likely have more than enough range for most people’s daily (or probably even weekly) commute. The cost advantage is also still there when charging at home. However, if you’re going on a roadtrip you’re much more likely to face long stretches without a fast charger, and probably no signs on the road warning you. It’s up to drivers to plan ahead to make sure they’ll have enough charge to make the next charger (and potentially have a backup location in case their first choice is full or broken). With the ubiquity of gas stations, and perhaps even more so GPS navigation on our phones, most drivers aren’t used to doing much planning when going on road trips anymore.

What is the title and who is the author of this book?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

What's funny about that is it took, as you said, decades to expand the infrastructure for gas, needing stations and storage tanks and fuel trucks to deliver the gas... Electric's infrastructure needs... Um... Charging stations. Installed where there's already electricity.

People act like it's a major hurdle, but it's actually a much, much smaller one than gas had to overcome.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Storage Batteries Stationary and Portable by J.T. Niblett, M. I. E. E. Copyright 1911/1912.

Looks like Archive's got it: https://archive.org/details/storage_batteries_1912/page/n3/mode/2up

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

It was the same people who made Steve Guttenberg a star.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No time to watch now, but would “Elon Musk” be the answer? He’s working hard on that!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's mostly killing the people riding in them

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

And anyone in their vicinity

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Actually, it’s mostly GM.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ever heard of the first car reaching 100km/h? Yep, an electric one, in 1899, "la jamais contente"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Must have been pretty terrifying riding that vehicle! Was red bull a thing back then?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

No, but red wine was

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I miss big clunky levers, switches and dials. All the best tech went CHAWNK.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

There's a bit from Clarkson where he compares an old school aluminium-bodied Land Rover to the newfangled SUV things of the same brand. Used to be, switching to 4WD involved pulling a lever connected to a ferry-sized piece of metal going ka-chunk. Nowadays, you press a button and a red light comes on. How is that going to get you out of a ditch?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

There's an 80 year old HVAC system in a section of the hospital I used to work at. This thing is just a giant radiator with big clunky fans that blow the heat from it into the unit. To power it on in winter you have to use all those cool old dials and crank it up. That thing I don't think has ever needed any major repairs and will last forever because it's so simple.

I now work in a newer condo building and the boilers and heating system is all digitally controlled and regulated. That thing goes down every other week and needs constant work

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)

God, imagine the trouble we could've saved if battery technology was less primitive at the time.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 3 days ago (6 children)

imagine where battery tech would be if we never started burning bones for power.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Imagine if that first ape that climbed down from the trees went "Nah." And climbed back up.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I would love to know the power capacity & range for these cars

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The cars were advertised as reliably getting 80 miles (130 km) between battery recharging, although in one test a Detroit Electric ran 211.3 miles (340.1 km) on a single charge. Top speed was only about 20 mph (32 km/h), but this was considered adequate for driving within city or town limits at the time.

From Wikipedia

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Considering what roads were like at the time, and how far most people were from other things, 80 miles round-trip is plenty.

Heck, that's plenty nowadays for a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Consider that the (in electric cars, obviously next-)most power hungry item on cars back then was the wind shield wiper motor. Modern cars easily put out 100kW, but then spend most of that in a thousand little ways. Back then, a 20W engine would be plenty.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

An electric car must have been pretty dirty back then. Most power was made by much less efficient coal generators after all.

I am not saying that this is still the case today, quite the opposite.

(Although no car is always better than a car)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, but an ICE car would've been pretty dirty too. For how light the cars were, they used a lot of fuel, and there was no emissions equipment whatsoever.

We've gotten pretty good at ICE efficiency. It's not as good as EV efficiency, but it's come a LONG way in the last 100+ years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

That came a few years after this photo was taken.

load more comments
view more: next ›