this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
580 points (95.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6788 readers
763 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I would unironically fully support this course of action

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought that said Putin Synthesizer. Lke what a Geiger–Müller counter?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bleep bleep bleep

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Does he even need to send them anything? Doesn't he just have to say a few words to give Ukraine permission to build their own? Although I guess if they lose US support, they wouldn't need permission anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Making a nuke is pretty difficult, even for a whole nation. It would probably take years for them to develop a nuke if they started from scratch.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Well, they ain't starting from scratch, cause they designed a bunch of nukes for the USSR.

They almost certainly have workable designs in a file drawer, and the old facilities are all in Ukraine too. It's a question of how much decommissioning those got in the nineties, and how long it takes to enrich the uranium.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He is sending another $6 billion to Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow really, what kind of goods or just money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-eyes-6-billion-parting-gift-joe-biden-pentagon-1982641

According to that, it looks like $4B in military aid as weapons pulled from US stocks and $2B in USAI money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He should also pardon Hunter just to stick it to Trump and the GOP.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›