this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
415 points (96.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3505 readers
764 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can NATO still mean something if the US leaves? I think so, but there is much soul searching to be done.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorta, but not really tbh. The US was always intrinsically backstopping the security side of things. Without us in it - and I mean this very seriously - it’s not really a credible threat to Russia or anyone else anymore.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

NATO article 5 will still have use in self defence, but obviously it will be way less impressive

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

The article is only powerful if it's enforced.

I suspect that Putin's direct report won't really sign on to any sort of defense of European countries.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let’s just kick America out if need be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It isn't credible now. It likely won't exist at all in 4 years. Unless it cedes even more decision making authority to the US and becomes even more of a puppet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The main point I was making is that Trump is almost certainly going to pull the US out of NATO altogether.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If not attempt to destroy it outright in an attempt to extort it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Only if he gets attention or money for doing so. Those are his two gods, and he serves no others.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

He serves Putin because Putin gives him attention and money. It's the same gods.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Putin also kinda obviously has some serious dirt on him

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

What dirt could he possibly have that the MAGA crowd gives two shits about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't all authority already lie with the USA? If we're going to be real, I mean. I'm sure France thinks otherwise but let's be real: NATO was always the "Uncle Sam will protect Europe from Russia"-treaty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

4 years? Try 6 months from now.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›