this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
163 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

1220 readers
59 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wow! 15 whole million! That'll teach em.

People really need to learn that fines which are not punitive break the social contract and turn the gov/regulator into a criminal co-conspirator engaging in racketeering — merely strong-arming its share of the proceeds, no better than the mob.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if shutting them down for a period of time would be a better punishment. They might feel it more if they can't collect data and advertise for a week, month, whatever. And that might also have a side effect of people not going back.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think enough people are addicted to it that they would demand the government undo it. I think adding two zeros to their fine would work better

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

People would definitely cry "censorship".
The old percentage of profit, or whatever, might work better

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Although I agree with the sentiment - the article mentions that it's "only" regarding about 1 mil people. (Probably South Korean users)

So it's still a $15 fine per violation. Could have been much higher, sure, but I don't know if that's a good return of investment for Facebook.

Maybe this case sets an example for other countries or regulatory bodies to start issuing fines to Facebook as well

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I'm sure that'll stop em!