this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
830 points (85.6% liked)

Political Memes

5355 readers
3230 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (4 children)

These numbers are ~~not~~ correct according to NY Times

Edit: I can’t math

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

I remember 2020 where Trump did not win. All problems are fixed now.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (10 children)

That makes an assumption that all or a big majority third party voters would prefer Harris over Trump.

Just for clarifying the logic here.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Don't mind me, just sweeping þrough to prune ð propoganda weeds on ðeir latest block/ban dodge accounts!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If this were true then American politics really are terrible. Minority should hold seats. America needs to revisit representation.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It’s actually not entirely true, it only counts stein as the only 3rd party (the libertarian candidate in PA got 3x as many votes as her, I’d bet those 3rd party votes wouldn’t have gone to Clinton) AND doesn’t report factual numbers.

It’s just not true.

That said unfortunately voting for a 3rd party candidate is largely useless in the USA and the forces trying to get their opponents voters to vote 3rd party are probably more overwhelming then the forces actually compelling folks to vote 3rd party.

FPTP needs to die in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 16 hours ago

Support ranked choice voting

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

North America’s electoral systems are so broken. It’s painful to see so much negativity, frustration, and fear directed at third parties in general. If that same energy was directed towards building a ranked choice voting system with proportional representation, like single transferable voting (STV), the duopolies would crumble and we could all actually vote for whoever we want without having to worry we might end up with the worst candidate winning.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (14 children)

If you don’t like stein, consider voting party for socialism and liberation instead.

They’re running Claudia de la Cruz on a platform of Palestinian statehood and an end to arms shipments to israel.

I found out recently that they’re on the ballot or have official write in status in 42 states, so unless you’re in Alaska, Nevada, Montana, South Dakota, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Georgia or Pennsylvania go for it!

E: forgot Nevada. They’re not officially recognized in Nevada.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

America's system is a problem.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Yeah no shit. But 2 weeks from the election isn't the time to try to fix it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I'll never forget what third party voting gets us; additional fucking choices beyond the dominant two-party system, encouraging broader participation. When a Republican or Democrat candidate loses any race, it's common to see them use third party candidates as a scapegoat.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Except it doesn’t. Not in presidentials anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Do you vote separately for your president in the US?

In Germany we vote for Parliament, whoever receives a majority of votes then gets the governmental mandate and their candidate becomes chancellor. Many people thought there never would be any other chancellor than from either the "social" democrats (SPD) or "christian" conservatives (CDU/CSU, also just called "Union"), until 2021 when the Green Party got so good in surveys we suddenly had three official candidates.

I do know about the "electorial college" nonsense, just asking what exactly the votes are aimed to be for, government or specifically the president.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

In the United States we vote for people not party. Every ballot is different depending on the year and where you live.

This November I will vote for

  • President/VP
  • 1 of 2 US Senate seats (the other will be voted on in 2 years)
  • My US House Representative
  • My State House Representative
  • A county board seat
  • A city commissioner
  • Retention of certain judges
  • A school board seat
  • A board member for our water district

If I choose to do so I could vote for multiple political parties across the ballot. Which is great because I might agree with my local green party of local issues but still want to vote for Democrats nationally.

I would really like to see us remove the electoral college, implement RCV or STAR. And move towards more of a proportional representation system.

Edit: Also worth mentioning that how elections are run also depends on where you live. States actually control how their citizens elect a President, I believe 2 are using RCV this year. Some states also allow local communities to choose how they elect local officials.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Primary Election, 1st Vote: One vote per voter to decide who represents the political party for the presidential election. Presidential Election, 2nd Vote: One vote per voter to decide who becomes the US President. The Electoral College and the stupid point system allows the minority vote to win. Yes, there are more names on the ballot for local government positions too. Technically, one could mix their votes with Democrat, Republican and other party candidates on the ballot.

I prefer the German voting system because it is based on the majority vote. FYI, I am allowed to vote in both Germany and USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago

Every one so excited to back the lesser of two evils and wondering why things are the way they are

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Me looking at the current state of our democracy and political system. 🤷

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Electing a felon certainly can't make it worse. It is not like he is fantasizing about deploying the national guard against his own citizens.... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/17/donald-trump-enemy-within-quote/75714201007/

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Most people that vote third party wouldn't vote otherwise. Assuming that every vote for Jill Stein would've gone to Hillary is quite the assumption. I always vote third party, so assuming my current vote for Jill Stein would've gone towards Harris instead is just dumb and wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›