this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
86 points (91.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35557 readers
2233 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They think, "Jesus was cool. I like him, and I'm gonna try to be like him." Kind of like their guiding light is what would Jesus do? But there isn't a focus on identification, recruiting others, judging others based on their religion, fear of God, fear of punishment for sinning, respect for clergy as an authority, rituals, worship, etc. Basically, just the example of Jesus' life.

inb4: Christian lol!! got em!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I met a group that called themselves 'Jesus Freaks', but they were just annoying trying to indocrinate people on music festivals.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ha, they weren't a band though, just people that walked the crowd trying to convince people of jesus.

I was a ruthless teenager questioning their beliefs until they got pulled away from me by a higher up.

They somehow couldn't answer why I would need jesus, when I'm already doing all the things they claim they only do because they found jesus.

Today I'm different and don't question people's believes as long as they don't start harming others in the name of their god.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

fan of Jesus?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My Grandmother always called this sort of thing being a "red letter Christian". Basically like you take a highlighter to everything Jesus specifically did or said and discard the rest.

My Mom's family all followed this principle since like the 70's thus saving my trans ass from any hint of intergenerationally inflicted religious trauma so I am a fan. My 92 year old great uncle went to bat to fight for non-binary gender accommodations in his seniors home because one of his nurses is an enby who was getting a raw deal from a number of their paitents. Honestly, though I don't think the Christian God is what he says he is, his kid seems weird but as a rules for life kinda thing the results seem good. .

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For context, in some versions of the Bible, the words of Jesus were printed in red font while the rest was black.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Interesting, I thought GamGam was just calling them whores

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jeezie. Like Swiftie, but for fan fiction on the Hebrew Bible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm really going to use this. And when there is a dilemma that's easily solved by WWJD, it's gonna be easy Jeezy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jeezy has a bit of a negative stigma since Kanye went full antisemite

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I'd call you a fan. I'm a fan of Gandalf.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Like uh... normal? Jesus, as described, seems like a pretty chill dude. It's christianity that gets into the crazy shit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I take it you haven't read the book of John?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. There's some good stuff there, like 8:32*, but it's full of so much crap** that... urgh.

*"And you'll know the truth, and the truth will set you free."

**Give the whole chapter 5 a check, specially 5:14; crippling people is apparently their god's punishment for sinning. Or 3:36, someone gets really pissy if you don't believe him!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was thinking John 6 is pretty nuts tbh. There are a lot of problems with Christ, like how quiet and accepting he seemed about slavery, or how fragile he is about his ego and being respected as God, the central message of Christ is about his divinity, not about moral teachings. He threatened anyone who disagreed with his divinity with eternal damnation and so on. Just not the kind of person you would think of as a "chill dude", rather the description "crazy" comes to mind when I read the book of John especially.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

His moral teachings are irrelevant. It's like how when cops volunteer to do a charity car wash. Moral behaviour doesn't get you everlasting life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Gospel of John is the last one written, much later than the others and is full of things that are suspicious. Almost as if it was specifically written to direct a nascent cult into the direction it wanted them to go and not particularly inspired by any actual events.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

oh interesting, TIL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_John#Historical_reliability

Thanks! I'll have to read the book of Mark and see how it compares (esp. I wonder if the events depicted in John 6 occur in the book of Mark).

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought that is kind of what Quakers are?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

You might be right. My grandmother was raised Quaker and this was very much how she brought me up in regards to religion.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You answered your own question because the literal term for a follower of Jesus Christ is in fact the word Christian lol got em.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm a freaking Nostradamus 🧙‍♂️🔮✨

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Isn't this just the Golden Rule? I've tried to live like this everyday for 20 years, but it can be difficult in this day and age. Most people don't think like that. It's easy to hold the door for people or say thank you, but it's hard when you don't receive the same courtesy. Jokes on them, though, cause they'll burn in hell!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

There is a lot of good messaging in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, etc. You don't need to be religious to appreciate that. Just like how somebody who appreciates in the mission and words of The Amazing Randi does not need a special label.

The labels start to come into play when discussing your belief or disbelief in a god or gods.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From reading your post it seems like you could be interested by the Jesus movement (that is the jewish followers of Jesus, before catholicism was codified and adopted by the Romans as state religion). Everything that wasn't authoritarian fear-based catholic was branded as "gnostic heresy" and purged from the canon, but there's some real good shit that is very close to the core message of Christ.

A recent(-ish) example of gnostic christianity is catharism, which was a heresy that lasted for a few centuries in the South of France. They had no clergy, just a caste of ascetic wise men and women who would walk the land and dispense wisdom and judgement. Very egalitarian, very spiritual, very christ-like. As you can imagine, they got crushed in one of the rare "self-crusades" in history (meaning the King of France sent his own armies to burn down cities in his own country and murder thousands upon thousands of his own subjects). As you can imagine there is not one history teacher in France who will tell you about this episode.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I learned about it in school though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

where was that ? My hometown is like 20km from a city that was entirely burned down and had its population eradicated during the first Albigense crusade - i swear to God it was never mentioned to me. My parents hadn't ever heard of it either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm from the north of France. I suppose it depends of the teacher. Nevermind I looked at the official program for middle age history and I did not see any mention of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah it certainly depends on the teacher. If you're into that kind of history, Pacome from Blast made a gigantic episode about this in his "L'empire n'a jamais pris fin" series. One of the best youtube essays i've ever seen in French.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Agnostic or spiritual.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

An enthusiast?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're describing that you view how he is depicted as a good role model. I think the best way to describe it would just be "I'm atheist/agnostic/etc but view Jesus as a good role model" or something to that effect.

Or just lean into chaos and go with "Jesus is my role model" with no elaboration and let people make of it what they will.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Yes! I like this one. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you need to be an -ian? Like, if you like the teachings of Ghandi, or Socrates, or Marcus Aurelius, you don't have to call yourself a Ghandian, or a Socratian, or an Aurelian. You just agree with their teachings.

I feel like you're just making a dig on Christians, and it's not like a lot of them don't deserve it, but what you're talking about isn't a religion. You don't need an -ian to like a philosophy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, I don't need to identify. That's too restrictive. I'm looking for a shorter way to describe it when asked.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If there exits one, most probably next question to you would be “What is that ?” And then you give the long explanation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I use the term Atheistic Christian, which essentially means I believe in a lot of the teachings of Jesus, but I don't believe he was any kind of divinity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Not to be confused with “secular Christian”, which in popular parlance means “I hang around church for the community but I’m not spiritual”.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_atheism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuism

Neither are perfect because Christian Athiests includes people who are "culturally Christian" as that can include clergy as an authority and rituals, and Jesuism would include splinter religious groups and is very easily confused with the Catholic Jesuit order. hopefully it's a starting point though!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What a coincidink, I just commented this on another thread.

The Thomas Jefferson bible might be up your alley. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

The Jesus fandom.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

A Jesuit! Oh wait...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

This describes me. I think about this often. The best I’ve come up with is Buddhist. Ultimately isn’t that what Christ taught?

load more comments
view more: next ›