I'm for UBI at the federal level, but everything I've read/heard about the details of 118, including from my tax lawyer sister, is that it's terribly written and would be bad policy as a result. We've had some wacky referendums in Oregon over the years, a lot of naive good intentions. I'll probably have to dust off my reading glasses for the text of 118, because if we try UBI and it fails, it'll be a warning example to discourage everyone else - the same way that the decriminalization-without-recovery-support was
Pacific Northwest - OR,WA,BC
Discussion specific to the Pacific Northwest. News, events, general topics.
Simple rules:
- Content related to the Pacific Northwest only. News, sports, political movements, etc.
- Don't be a dick.
- No NSFW content.
Yeah this is a good call - I will be digging into this before making up my mind.
I’ve heard from multiple places that the text of the bill has some pretty big drawbacks, specifically enough that the governor has come out against it. I can understand the impact to businesses but it has such clear social benefits.
If the text is bad, let the legislatures pass an amendment or a new measure for us to vote on. They bungled the drug decriminalization rollout so I’m not ready to let them kill another good policy. I refuse to throw in the towel on progressive policies. Let’s do referendums every year and force the change the people or Oregon want.
Kinda-sorta UBI. Seems like a good way to show the positives of such a program to the whole country.
Yup. Just like pandemic payments, only this time not borrowing against national debt, just sharing profits--only unlike pandemic stimulus payments this has no income restrictions.
God I love living in a blue state, especially Oregon ❤️