this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
300 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

60443 readers
4067 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 114 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It could take a century

Maybe we should chip in and buy a second robot.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe we should chip in and buy a second robot.

Hear me out: three robots.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago (1 children)

With more than one, a union can be formed. So, no.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The union would be extremely powerful with just one robot though. There would be no competition or different opinions. If the single robot strikes to get better working conditions or better pay, the entire workforce is on strike.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yes yes, but the robot cannot strike, you see, because one robot must make the strike motion, another robot must second the strike motion, and then all the robots must vote. if there is no robot to second the strike motion, then no robots may vote, meaning the strike cannot pass.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I would like to add to this conversation, "I've talked it over with myself and I've decided I'm going on strike," is an extremely powerful thing to say.

...I didn't promise my addition would be valuable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Also that roebuck could probably lift three tons.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

It may take a century not because of robot costs, but because the materials haven't decayed enough to store in a dry cask.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

This is getting out of hand

[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Such a fantastic movie, I need to watch it again

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is what we need AI for. Robots that can independantly handle this type of task that is too dangerous for humans.

Fuck the generative garbage we have now. Work on this stuff instead.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But where's the money in that?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

"Our shareholders insist the line must go up!"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

It's okay because as the radiation blasts away at the robots circuitry they'll have to replace it. Then they could just replace it with a better robot every few years as technology improves. It'll become exponentially more powerful. And by the end of it they'll have a superpowered radioactive robot... that they've... used for slave labor... Huh. Maybe they should rethink this plan.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nobody had a faster robot?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Those robots are now stuck within the power plant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

didn't this happen like 4 years ago?