this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21198 readers
242 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    4
    submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
     

    I have been using Linux for a few years, usually some flavor of Debian. But recently I acquired an older Thinkpad and thought it would behoove me to use something more... involved.
    So I chose to dive into Manjaro and only broke pacman once. So now the question... can I say I'm using Arch btw or is that a faux pas?

    top 17 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Manjaro, is in fact, Arch/Manjaro, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Arch plus Manjaro. Manjaro is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Arch system made useful by pacman, yay and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

    I can see future archeologists (god forbid, Ai archeologists) digging up old posts like this and going, "tf, this was upvoted? Interjecting with too much tangential information? The tone came off rude though?" and not get the reference if they weren't versed in linux community culture already

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Nah, Manjaro is Arch for toddlers.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

    Finally a distro that is on my mental level.

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    I like to call it Arch for the lazy.

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

    Endeavour differs very little from Arch once you're past the installer. To the point I've never understood why it's a standalone distro instead of an optional Arch installer, as an alternative to/part of archinstall.

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Also drive Manjaro and I tell people I use Arch, there are dozens of us

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

    I mean my Job is already giving me impostor syndrome... I really do not need my Distro to make me feel that way...

    [–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

    I'll give you the pass

    [–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Also a pro tip: Use endeavourOS not manjaro, it's more stable

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I feel my life is too stable. I need more excitement.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Don't update any arch based distro for long enough and your life will be plenty exciting when you do. Bonus points if you use a non-lts kernel that can blip out of existence at any moment along with all the graphics drivers

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    How long is to long? I've been running the same arch install for a few years and wondering if it supposed to be time for a reinstall?

    *I also have backups of all my configs and read the arch news before updating so I'm not really that worried.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    Are you not updating it regularly? They said, "Don't update for long enough..."

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

    ...oh, yeah I miss read that. I took it as don't use arch for to long without reinstalling rather than don't not update for too long. I update about once a week.

    [–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

    Arch is relatively unstable just by being rolling, but manjaro is another level of unstable lol. if wish to use it, im not gonna stop you, but I'd advise you not to rely on the computer you install it on.