Don't link to X.
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
320 points (98.5% liked)
politics
19089 readers
4079 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You mean Twitter.
He deadnames Vivvy; we deadname Birdsite. Thems the brakes.
He really is in his element when he’s verbally sparring with people.
I’m really hoping he does some debates with Harris because I think she can put him off balance.
I felt that the equipment troubles he was referring to was to make the lady sitting closest to him look bad but also to give him an excuse to walk away if they kept asking hard questions.
He won't ever debate Harris. He'll keep coming up with excuses because he and his team know it'll be a disaster.
I’d say there’s a better then fifty percent chance his ego gets the better of him and he debates her.
I would love to see the top geriatric candidate for both parties get absolutely destroyed by a debate performance in the same election year
Yeah but Trump wouldn’t ever be able to step down and let the couchfucker take the top of the ticket.
I felt that the equipment troubles
the "equipment trouble" was him unable to say "i spent an hour fighting against using live fact checker during the broadcast"
“About 45 minutes before Trump took the stage, the former president pushed back on NABJ staffers who wanted to live fact check the event, according to a person familiar with the planning. The board pushed back against the last minute demand. When Trump took the stage, he said the delay was due to NABJ’s audio issues.”
What an elderly snowflake.
They should have kept pushing him on the “black jobs” question.
They should have kept pushing him on everything. He got away easy time and again by shouting and antagonising and talking over the interviewers.
They should have pused him off the stage.
We know what should be done.
I suppose he could have tried to say it was any job done by a black person. That might have gotten him out of that.
Just do the math and have him answer.
"If a black job just means employment isn't that just a job."
Trump:
1.) "Yes"
Follow up:
"Then why say Black Job?"
2.) "No"
Follow up:
"Then what is a black job"
It's all fruitless anyway, he will meander directly into talking about how immigrants "are bad."
The dood is weird. I'm telling you.
New Republic Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Name: New Republic Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-republic/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
Footer
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.