this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)

UK Nature and Environment

426 readers
45 users here now

General Instance Rules:

Community Specific Rules:

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The RBCT, considered the largest field experiment of its kind in history, was established to test whether killing badgers would result in a reduction of bovine TB in cattle, and followed many years of badger persecution in the name of disease control without evidence to justify it. The trial compared the incidents of cattle TB in areas where badgers were killed, with those where they weren’t. In total, some 11,000 badgers were shot during the trial.

The report on the results of the RBCT, published in 2006, claimed that the proactive killing of enough badgers over a wide enough area could significantly reduce incidents of cattle TB, albeit the authors of the report advised against such a policy on the grounds that it would not be cost-effective. In spite of this, the incoming coalition government announced in 2010 that licenced badger culling would be introduced in England.

The most recent study, led by eminent veterinary epidemiologist Professor Paul Torgerson at the University of Zurich, re-analysed the data from the RBCT, and concluded that, when using more suitable statistical methods, and accounting for all cattle herds in which bovine TB was detected during the trial, there was no evidence to support an effect of badger culling.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My country doesn't even have badgers, but I've kept up with international news well enough over the years that even I have known this for years. Just start basing policies on scientific evidence already.