this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
25 points (85.7% liked)

Housing Crisis

171 readers
1 users here now

A place to post news and have discussions about the housing crisis, its effect on people who are priced out, and what the future has in store.

Post news, share opinions and discuss potential solutions. Change begins with every new person.

Rules:

  1. No spam, no fake ass quasi-news, and no low-tier memes.
  2. No bigotry or hate speech or other illegal posting shit.
  3. No derailing valuable conversations using deviant tactics.

Other resources:

https://lemmy.world/c/rebubble

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
25
An experiment doled out money to homeless people in Denver, no strings attached. Here’s what happened. (coloradosun.com)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

They were separated into three groups. Group A received $1,000 per month for a year. Group B received $6,500 the first month and $500 for the next 11 months. And group C, the control group, received $50 per month....

And ... no surprise ...

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to have to bust out the Adderall and actually read the article? /s

Good stuff. Too bad we have a huge portion of the country who thinks that is Communism and against God.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Unfortunately, that mandatory (??) pull from the article -every- post seems to get ... gave away the suspense ... so I figured that'd do ya ;->

Article notes how much taxpayer money was saved. Where I live they spend millions a year paying cops to take apart the encampments. Cheaper than Helsinki, where giving the homeless a home is mandatory ... and is pretty much wiping out homelessness. Oh, and as I recall, that kind of 'communism' was a big part of Christ's message they've conventiently forgotten.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m confused at how they spent 2.1 million dollars or close to a quarter of what they raised on fundraising and delivery. If there were aid workers working with people that would make sense but there were just 3 surveys over the course of the year and if you didn’t fill it out you still got paid. This seems like a relatively minimal amount of work: establish direct deposits, create a survey, and analyze a bit of data when you’re done

Also maybe I’m misinterpreting but the graphs seem to show the control group having much more similar outcomes to those getting larger sums and payments having much less of an effect than I’d expect

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Also maybe I’m misinterpreting but the graphs seem to show the control group having much more similar outcomes to those getting larger sums and payments having much less of an effect than I’d expect

It does seem like the amount had very little correlation with the outcome.

I'd like to see a comparison with a zero-dollar control group. This study seems to assume that the numbers at the beginning wouldn't have improved without financial intervention.