this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1436 readers
347 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Verizon initially failed to remove a flawed update file that caused two outages.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, how nice that they agreed to the fine. Wouldn't want to punish a company without its approval.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Right? Hit'em with a fine they can't agree with. Make the bastards sit back in their fancy corner office chairs.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (4 children)

That's comparable to about a $12.75 fine for someone with a $60k net income.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

This sort of disclaimer needs to be beside every article concerning corporate fines. Fucking ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It was a one time event. Granted losing access to emergency services is very bad but they did come forward and admit wrong doing. If this happens a second time they can jump the fine way up.

Also you should look at the fine for a first offense parking violation

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But it's not the first time. A couple examples:

https://www.theverge.com/2021/12/19/22845283/fcc-verizon-att-mobile-carriers-911-calls https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/01/fcc-blasts-verizon-for-911-outages-during-summer-2012-storm/

My highest upvoted comment on reddit was actually in a thread joking about fees to recoup the fine, suggesting they'd call it a "911 Memorial Fee".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ok, I didn't know that. Yeah they need to get in some more trouble and the regulators should ask way more questions. In the worse case it shouldn't be uncalled for to revoke there license to operate as a mobile carrier

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Literally 10% of my verizon bill

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That's the idea

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Cost of doing business, baby