this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

Natural Philosophy

164 readers
1 users here now

A community for anyone interested in big questions and meta-questions pertaining to the natural world. For the purpose of this community, natural philosophy encompasses philosophy of science and metaphysics as well.

For those of you on Matrix, there is a super-space which tries to aggregate scientific chat rooms and spaces at #science-space:matrix.org, including a room for philosophy of science and a physics space.

Moderation: Submissions and comments are moderated on a subjective case-by-case basis to facilitate and maintain a healthy, pleasant, and rewarding environment for anyone with a genuine interest in learning, participating, or merely lurking. Just to state some obvious (non-exhaustive set of) behaviours and content we won't have here: bigotry; hate speech; sealioning; strawmen; pseudo-/anti-science; dis-/misinformation. Additional context may be taken into consideration as well.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Freeman Dyson’s Disturbing Scientific Theology

Metadata

  • Author: John Horgan

  • Category: article

    Highlights

Dyson is rejecting the notion that physics can find a “final theory” that solves the riddle of the universe and brings physics to an end. Dyson is also hinting at a solution to the deepest of all theological puzzles, the problem of evil: Why would God create such a painful, unjust world?

It is a subversive laugh, the laugh of a man who insists that science at its best is “a rebellion against authority.”

Dyson was provoked into taking up this final topic by Steven Weinberg’s notorious remark that “the more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless.”

In *Infinite in All Directions*, Dyson predicts that the entire universe might eventually be transformed into one great mind.

Dyson insists that even a cosmic superintelligence cannot solve the riddle of existence. There will “always be new things happening, new information coming in, new worlds to explore, a constantly expanding domain of life, consciousness and memory.” The quest for knowledge will be--*must* be—“infinite in all directions.”

“Since we know the laws of physics are mathematical,” Dyson says, “and we know that mathematics is an inconsistent system, it’s sort of plausible that physics will also be inconsistent” and therefore open-ended.

“If you go into the future, what we call science won't be the same thing anymore, but that doesn't mean there won't be interesting questions.”

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here