this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2549 points (94.3% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19597 readers
2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

[email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's kinda genius ngl, even tho I'm pretty sure it's only applies to creative professions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'm out of the loop, what did the SCOTUS do now?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bad example. The cases where businesses could refuse service to a customer were due to religious freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Not liking Trump would not fall under that category. Not sure about the other example though.

In general though, I think this would be fine. As long as this business is not funded or supported by taxpayer money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

The more I see news about the United States the less I'm surprised

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think this is ok. It’s how the market works. If you have enough people who agree with your stance, then you’ll survive, if not, you fail. Transversely, if you are trying to make a profitable business, you remove all roadblocks from a consumer who wants to do business with you.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Ugh should have read "no sales to trump supporters or religious nutbags. Whoops those 2 are the same thing"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›